CVE-2019-1860
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the dashboard gadget rendering of Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to obtain or manipulate sensitive information between a user’s browser and Cisco Unified Intelligence Center. The vulnerability is due to the lack of gadget validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing a user to load a malicious gadget. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain sensitive information, such as current user credentials, or manipulate data between the user’s browser and Cisco Unified Intelligence Center in the context of the malicious gadget.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center's dashboard gadget rendering mechanism due to missing validation of gadgets. An unauthenticated remote attacker can force users to load malicious gadgets, enabling theft of sensitive information like user credentials or manipulation of data in the context of the user's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0\(1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Unified Intelligence Center installation and versionLocate the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center installation and determine its installed version number. Compare your version against the affected version: 12.0(1).Affected if The installed version is exactly 12.0(1)
-
Determine if dashboard functionality is accessibleVerify whether the web interface for Cisco Unified Intelligence Center is accessible and if users can access dashboard features that render gadgets.Affected if The dashboard interface is accessible to users or unauthenticated attackers
-
Inspect gadget source configurationExamine the configuration settings related to dashboard gadgets, specifically looking for any controls that define which gadget sources are allowed to be loaded.Affected if Gadget sources are not restricted or validated
-
Check for Content Security Policy headersInspect HTTP responses from the Cisco Unified Intelligence Center web interface to determine if Content Security Policy (CSP) headers are present and whether they restrict gadget sources.Affected if CSP headers are missing or do not restrict external gadget sources
-
Review Same-Origin Policy controlsCheck the server or application configuration for Same-Origin Policy settings that control cross-origin gadget injection.Affected if Same-Origin Policy controls are not enforced or can be bypassed
You are affected if Cisco Unified Intelligence Center version 12.0(1) is installed AND the dashboard gadget rendering feature is accessible without proper validation, CSP, or Same-Origin Policy controls in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict validation and sanitization of all gadgets rendered in the dashboard, enforce Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict gadget sources, and apply proper Same-Origin Policy controls to prevent cross-origin gadget injection.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1860 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data