SymfonyFramework / library · Sensiolabs

CVE-2019-18886

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.3.7 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Symfony 4.2.0 to 4.2.11 and 4.3.0 to 4.3.7. The ability to enumerate users was possible due to different handling depending on whether the user existed when making unauthorized attempts to use the switch users functionality. This is related to symfony/security.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Symfony's security component had a user enumeration vulnerability in the switch user functionality. The application returned different responses when attempting to switch to existing versus non-existing users, allowing attackers to discover valid usernames through repeated unauthenticated or unauthorized requests.

MitigationUpgrade to Symfony 4.2.12, 4.3.8, or later versions where the user existence check was made consistent, or implement rate limiting on the switch user endpoint to prevent enumeration attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SymfonyFramework / library
Affected:>= 4.2.0, <= 4.2.11>= 4.3.0, <= 4.3.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Symfony framework version
    Run `composer show symfony/symfony 2>/dev/null | grep version` or check your composer.lock file for the symfony/symfony package version
    Affected if The installed version is >= 4.2.0 and <= 4.2.11, or >= 4.3.0 and <= 4.3.7
  2. Verify switch user feature is enabled
    Inspect your application's security configuration file (config/packages/security.yaml or app/config/config.yml) and look for the switch_user setting under your firewall configuration
    Affected if The switch_user option is set to true or configured with a provider under any firewall entry
  3. Confirm user provider is configured
    Check the security configuration for a user provider (property: or entity: or another provider type) that the switch user feature would use
    Affected if A user provider is configured and the switch_user feature is active, allowing the application to query user existence
  4. Test response consistency (if direct testing is authorized)
    Make two GET requests to the switch user endpoint (typically ?_switch_user=EXISTING_USER and ?_switch_user=NONEXISTENT_USER) and compare the HTTP response codes or error messages
    Affected if The application returns different responses (such as a 302 redirect for existing users versus a 404 or error for non-existing users), confirming the enumeration vulnerability is present

You are affected if your Symfony version falls within 4.2.0-4.2.11 or 4.3.0-4.3.7 AND the switch_user feature is enabled in your security configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.3.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Symfony 4.2.12, 4.3.8, or later versions where the user existence check was made consistent, or implement rate limiting on the switch user endpoint to prevent enumeration attacks.

Fix this in Symfony Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-18886 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-18886 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data