OpenshiftApplication · Redhat

CVE-2019-19346

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.11.188-4 / 4.1.37 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the container openshift/mariadb-apb, affecting versions before the following 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, and 3.11.188-4 . An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The openshift/mariadb-apb container allows writable access to /etc/passwd, enabling an attacker with container access to modify user accounts or add new privileged users by editing this file, achieving local privilege escalation.

MitigationUpdate the mariadb-apb container image to versions 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, or 3.11.188-4 or later, and configure the container security context to mount /etc/passwd as read-only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenshiftApplication
Affected:< 3.11.188-4>= 4.0.0, < 4.1.37>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.21>= 4.3.0, < 4.3.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify mariadb-apb container version
    Retrieve the running mariadb-apb container image version using 'oc get pod <pod_name> -o jsonpath={.spec.containers[0].image}' or equivalent container runtime command, then inspect the image tag or digest
    Affected if The version is less than 3.11.188-4, or between 4.0.0 and 4.1.36, between 4.2.0 and 4.2.20, or between 4.3.0 and 4.3.4
  2. Check security context for /etc/passwd write access
    Examine the container security context or pod security context configuration in the deployment yaml or via 'oc get pod <pod_name> -o yaml' and look for securityContext settings, specifically any allowPrivilegeEscalation or fsGroup settings that may permit writes to /etc/passwd
    Affected if The security context does not explicitly set /etc/passwd as read-only or allows writable supplemental groups
  3. Verify /etc/passwd mount configuration
    Check the pod specification for volume mounts: run 'oc get pod <pod_name> -o jsonpath={.spec.containers[0].volumeMounts}' and inspect whether /etc/passwd is mounted as a volume and inspect the associated volume definition for readOnly settings
    Affected if /etc/passwd is mounted without the readOnly: true flag set on the volume mount
  4. Test write access to /etc/passwd from within container
    If you have access to exec into the container, attempt to verify writability: 'oc exec <pod_name> -- touch /etc/passwd.test' and check if it succeeds, or check file permissions directly with 'oc exec <pod_name> -- ls -la /etc/passwd'
    Affected if The file shows write permissions for the container's running user or the touch test succeeds

A user is affected if the mariadb-apb container version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND /etc/passwd is mounted or configured with write access in the security context.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.11.188-4 / 4.1.37 / 4.2.21 or later
Fixed in 3.11.188-44.1.374.2.21
Interim mitigation

Update the mariadb-apb container image to versions 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, or 3.11.188-4 or later, and configure the container security context to mount /etc/passwd as read-only.

Fix this in Openshift Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-19346 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-19346 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data