OpenshiftApplication · Redhat

CVE-2019-19348

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.11.188-4 / 4.1.37 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An insecure modification vulnerability in the /etc/passwd file was found in the container openshift/apb-base, affecting versions before the following 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, and 3.11.188-4. An attacker with access to the container could use this flaw to modify /etc/passwd and escalate their privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The openshift/apb-base container image contains a misconfiguration that allows insecure modification of the /etc/passwd file. This permission misconfiguration permits any user with container access to modify /etc/passwd, enabling them to add privileged users or alter existing account settings for privilege escalation.

MitigationUpgrade openshift/apb-base to version 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, 3.11.188-4 or later which contain the patched container image with correct /etc/passwd file permissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenshiftApplication
Affected:< 3.11.188-4>= 4.0.0, < 4.1.37>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.21>= 4.3.0, < 4.3.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if openshift/apb-base image is deployed
    Run 'oc get images | grep apb-base' or 'kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o jsonpath={..image} | tr ' ' '\n' | sort -u | grep apb-base' to find containers using this image
    Affected if The image is present in the environment
  2. Determine the installed apb-base image version
    For each pod using apb-base, run 'oc describe pod <podname> -n <namespace> | grep -i image' or inspect the image directly with 'oc get pod <podname> -o jsonpath={.spec.containers[*].image}'
    Affected if The image version falls within the affected ranges: < 3.11.188-4, >= 4.0.0 and < 4.1.37, >= 4.2.0 and < 4.2.21, or >= 4.3.0 and < 4.3.5
  3. Check /etc/passwd file permissions inside the container
    Exec into a container using the apb-base image and run 'ls -la /etc/passwd' to view permissions. The command is: 'oc exec -it <podname> -- ls -la /etc/passwd'
    Affected if The file permissions show write access for non-root users (permissions like 666 or writable by group/others)
  4. Verify if /etc/passwd is writable by testing modification
    As a non-root user inside the container, attempt to create a test user with 'useradd -M -r testuser 2>/dev/null || echo writable' or check using 'touch /etc/passwd.test 2>/dev/null && rm /etc/passwd.test'
    Affected if The write operation succeeds, confirming the container is vulnerable

A user is affected if the openshift/apb-base image version is within the vulnerable ranges and /etc/passwd inside the container is writable by non-root users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.11.188-4 / 4.1.37 / 4.2.21 or later
Fixed in 3.11.188-44.1.374.2.21
Interim mitigation

Upgrade openshift/apb-base to version 4.3.5, 4.2.21, 4.1.37, 3.11.188-4 or later which contain the patched container image with correct /etc/passwd file permissions.

Fix this in Openshift Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-19348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-19348 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data