CVE-2019-3397
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAtlassian Bitbucket Data Center licensed instances starting with version 5.13.0 before 5.13.6 (the fixed version for 5.13.x), from 5.14.0 before 5.14.4 (fixed version for 5.14.x), from 5.15.0 before 5.15.3 (fixed version for 5.15.x), from 5.16.0 before 5.16.3 (fixed version for 5.16.x), from 6.0.0 before 6.0.3 (fixed version for 6.0.x), and from 6.1.0 before 6.1.2 (the fixed version for 6.1.x) allow remote attackers who have admin permissions to achieve remote code execution on a Bitbucket server instance via path traversal through the Data Center migration tool.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Atlassian Bitbucket Data Center's Data Center migration tool allows remote authenticated administrators to achieve remote code execution by manipulating file paths during migration operations. The vulnerability affects multiple version branches from 5.13.x through 6.1.x.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.13.0, < 5.13.6>= 5.14.0, < 5.14.4>= 5.15.0, < 5.15.3>= 5.16.0, < 5.16.3>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.3>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Bitbucket versionRun 'bitbucket-version.sh' or check the Bitbucket admin UI under 'Administration' > 'Server settings' > 'Application version', or query the REST API endpoint /rest/api/1.0/application-propertiesAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 5.13.0-5.13.5, 5.14.0-5.14.3, 5.15.0-5.15.2, 5.16.0-5.16.2, 6.0.0-6.0.2, or 6.1.0-6.1.1
-
Determine if Data Center migration tool is in useCheck if any migration import operations have been performed recently via Bitbucket audit logs, or check if the /migration/* endpoints are accessible on the instanceAffected if Migration import operations have been executed on the affected version ranges, allowing path traversal during those operations
-
Verify administrator access controlsReview the Bitbucket administration console under 'Administration' > 'Users and groups' to list all users with 'System Admin' or 'Admin' global permissionsAffected if Any external or untrusted users possess administrative privileges and the Bitbucket version is within the affected ranges
The environment is affected if Bitbucket Data Center is running any version from 5.13.0 through 5.13.5, 5.14.0 through 5.14.3, 5.15.0 through 5.15.2, 5.16.0 through 5.16.2, 6.0.0 through 6.0.2, or 6.1.0 through 6.1.1 and the Data Center migration tool feature has been used.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.13.65.14.45.15.3
Upgrade Bitbucket Data Center to the fixed versions (5.13.6, 5.14.4, 5.15.3, 5.16.3, 6.0.3, or 6.1.2) or later. Restrict admin access and review migration tool usage until patching is complete.
5.13.6 (for 5.13.x), 5.14.4 (for 5.14.x), 5.15.3 (for 5.15.x), 5.16.3 (for 5.16.x), 6.0.3 (for 6.0.x), or 6.1.2 (for 6.1.x)
- 1. Identify the current Bitbucket version by checking the Bitbucket administration console or running 'bitbucket --version'
- 2. Determine which version branch your instance is running on (5.13.x, 5.14.x, 5.15.x, 5.16.x, 6.0.x, or 6.1.x)
- 3. For version 5.13.x: upgrade to version 5.13.6 or later
- 4. For version 5.14.x: upgrade to version 5.14.4 or later
- 5. For version 5.15.x: upgrade to version 5.15.3 or later
- 6. For version 5.16.x: upgrade to version 5.16.3 or later
- 7. For version 6.0.x: upgrade to version 6.0.3 or later
- 8. For version 6.1.x: upgrade to version 6.1.2 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-3397 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-3397 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data