CVE-2022-36804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple API endpoints in Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Data Center 7.0.0 before version 7.6.17, from version 7.7.0 before version 7.17.10, from version 7.18.0 before version 7.21.4, from version 8.0.0 before version 8.0.3, from version 8.1.0 before version 8.1.3, and from version 8.2.0 before version 8.2.2, and from version 8.3.0 before 8.3.1 allows remote attackers with read permissions to a public or private Bitbucket repository to execute arbitrary code by sending a malicious HTTP request. This vulnerability was reported via our Bug Bounty Program by TheGrandPew.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple API endpoints in Atlassian Bitbucket Server and Data Center contain a command injection vulnerability. Attackers with read permissions to any public or private repository can send malicious HTTP requests to these API endpoints, allowing execution of arbitrary code on the affected server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.6.17>= 7.7.0, < 7.17.10>= 7.18.0, < 7.21.4>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.3>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.3>= 8.2.0, < 8.2.2= 8.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Bitbucket versionLog into Bitbucket as an administrator, navigate to Administration > Server Settings > Application info, or query the /rest/api/1.0/application-properties endpointAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 7.0.0-7.6.16, 7.7.0-7.17.9, 7.18.0-7.21.3, 8.0.0-8.0.2, 8.1.0-8.1.2, 8.2.0-8.2.1, or 8.3.0
-
Verify API access is enabledConfirm the Bitbucket REST API is accessible by making a GET request to /rest/api/1.0/application-properties or checking that API access is not disabled in Administration > Server SettingsAffected if The REST API is accessible without additional authentication restrictions beyond standard Bitbucket authentication
-
Check for exposed API endpointsTest access to vulnerable endpoints such as /rest/api/1.0/projects/{project}/repos/{repo}/archive with specially crafted parameters, or review access logs for requests to /rest/api/1.0/repositories/ endpoints with archive or bundle parametersAffected if These API endpoints respond to authenticated users with read-level permissions
-
Review anonymous access settingNavigate to Administration > Server Settings > Authentication and check if Anonymous access is enabled, or inspect the bitbucket.properties configuration file for the feature.anonymous.access.enabled settingAffected if Anonymous access is enabled, allowing unauthenticated attackers potential exposure to the vulnerable endpoints
Your environment is affected if Bitbucket Server or Data Center is running any version from 7.0.0 through 7.21.3, 8.0.0 through 8.2.1, or 8.3.0, and the REST API is accessible to users with repository read permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6.177.17.107.21.4
Upgrade Bitbucket Server/Data Center to version 7.6.17, 7.17.10, 7.21.4, 8.0.3, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, or 8.3.1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to Bitbucket instances and review API endpoint exposure.
Upgrade to 7.6.17, 7.17.10, 7.21.4, 8.0.3, 8.1.3, 8.2.2, or 8.3.1 (or later) depending on your current major version branch
- 1. Identify current Bitbucket version by checking the administration console or running `bitbucket-version.sh`
- 2. Review Atlassian upgrade documentation and release notes for the target version
- 3. Create a complete backup of the Bitbucket home directory and database
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require downtime
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed version from Atlassian (e.g., from https://www.atlassian.com/software/bitbucket/download-archives)
- 6. Stop the Bitbucket service
- 7. Run the installer for the target fixed version
- 8. Start the Bitbucket service and verify it starts successfully
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data