CVE-2019-3905
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus 5.x before build 5703 has SSRF.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus versions 5.x prior to build 5703 allows remote attackers to make the application perform requests to arbitrary servers, potentially accessing internal resources or services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 5.1= 5.2= 5.3= 5.4= 5.5= 5.6= 5.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ADSelfService Plus is installedCheck for the application process or installation directory. On Windows, look for 'ADSelfService Plus' in Programs or check for the service. On Linux, check /opt/manageengine/adselfserviceplus or similar paths.Affected if The application is installed and running on the system
-
Locate the build version fileNavigate to the ADSelfService Plus installation directory and find the build number. Common locations: 'build.txt' in the root directory, or within the 'conf' folder, or check the 'product.info' file.Affected if Unable to locate version information indicates the product may not be properly installed
-
Read the installed build numberOpen the build version file (build.txt, build.number, or similar) and note the exact build number displayed.Affected if The displayed build number is missing or unreadable
-
Compare build to vulnerable rangeCompare your installed build number against the affected versions: 5.0 through 5.7 with build numbers earlier than 5703. If running 5.x series with build < 5703, you are affected.Affected if Build number is 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, or 5.7 AND the specific build is less than 5703
-
Verify web interface accessibilityADSelfService Plus SSRF is exploitable through the web application. Check if the web interface is accessible on default ports 8888 (HTTP) or 443/8443 (HTTPS). Attempt to access the login page or check if the application responds to HTTP requests.Affected if The web interface is exposed and the version/build is in the vulnerable range
You are affected if ADSelfService Plus version 5.x (build 5702 or earlier) is installed and the web interface is accessible, as the SSRF vulnerability exists in the application web requests functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to ADSelfService Plus build 5703 or later to address the SSRF vulnerability.
ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus build 5703 or later
- 1. Back up the ADSelfService Plus database and configuration files before starting the upgrade process.
- 2. Download the latest version of ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus (build 5703 or later) from the official ManageEngine download page: www.manageengine.com/products/active-directory-self-service/
- 3. Stop the ADSelfService Plus service on the server.
- 4. Run the installer for the new build (5703 or later).
- 5. Follow the on-screen upgrade wizard instructions, pointing to the existing installation directory when prompted.
- 6. After upgrade completes, start the ADSelfService Plus service.
- 7. Verify the SSRF vulnerability is patched by checking that the affected endpoint no longer allows arbitrary URL fetching.
- 8. Test that normal ADSelfService Plus functionality (password reset, self-service) continues to work properly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-3905 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-3905 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data