Mq ApplianceApplication · Ibm

CVE-2019-4560

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-12-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.0.0.13 / 9.0.0.8 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM MQ and IBM MQ Appliance 9.1 CD, 9.1 LTS, 9.0 LTS, and 8.0 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack caused by channels processing poorly formatted messages. IBM X-Force ID: 166357.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM MQ and IBM MQ Appliance channels contain a denial of service vulnerability when processing poorly formatted messages. An attacker can send malformed messages through MQ channels to cause the channel to become unresponsive or terminate, disrupting message flow between queue managers.

MitigationApply the appropriate IBM MQ security patch (PTF) for the affected version (8.0, 9.0 LTS, or 9.1 LTS/CD). If immediate patching is not possible, implement network-level access controls to restrict untrusted sources from sending messages to MQ channels.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mq ApplianceApplication
Affected:>= 8.0.0.0, < 8.0.0.13>= 9.0.0.0, < 9.0.0.8>= 9.1.0.0, < 9.1.0.4>= 9.1.1, < 9.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM MQ Appliance version
    Run 'display version' command on the appliance console or check the IBM MQ version via mqsc command 'DISPLAY QMGR VERSION' or check /opt/mqm/installation/kbi/VERSION file if accessible
    Affected if The installed version falls within: 8.0.0.0-8.0.0.12, 9.0.0.0-9.0.0.7, 9.1.0.0-9.1.0.3, or 9.1.1-9.1.3
  2. Confirm MQ channels are configured
    Run mqsc command 'DISPLAY CHANNEL(*)' to list all channel definitions, or check channel configuration files in /var/mqm/channels/ directory
    Affected if Any defined channels exist and are active, as the vulnerability affects message processing through MQ channels
  3. Verify channel listener status
    Run 'DISPLAY LISTENER(*)' via mqsc or check if port 1414 (default MQ listener) is open via 'netstat -an | grep 1414'
    Affected if A listener is running and accepting connections, as malformed messages must be sent through an accessible channel endpoint
  4. Check network exposure of MQ ports
    Review firewall rules or network ACLs controlling access to MQ listener ports (commonly 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417). Use 'netstat -an' or firewall-cmd/iptables to list open ports and their source restrictions
    Affected if MQ listener ports are accessible from untrusted networks, as the attack requires sending malformed messages to the channel

You are affected if your IBM MQ Appliance version is within the vulnerable ranges AND MQ channels with an accessible listener are in use, allowing untrusted sources to send messages to the channel.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.0.0.13 / 9.0.0.8 / 9.1.0.4 or later
Fixed in 8.0.0.139.0.0.89.1.0.4
Interim mitigation

Apply the appropriate IBM MQ security patch (PTF) for the affected version (8.0, 9.0 LTS, or 9.1 LTS/CD). If immediate patching is not possible, implement network-level access controls to restrict untrusted sources from sending messages to MQ channels.

Fix this in Mq Appliance Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-4560 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-4560 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data