CVE-2020-4938
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM MQ Appliance 9.1 and 9.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 191815.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM MQ Appliance versions 9.1 and 9.2 are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user into unknowingly submitting malicious requests to the appliance's web interface, potentially executing unauthorized administrative actions on the MQ queue manager.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.1, < 9.2.2>= 9.1.0.0, < 9.1.0.8>= 9.2.0.0, < 9.2.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM MQ Appliance is deployedIdentify whether the target system is an IBM MQ Appliance (hardware appliance or virtual appliance image) rather than IBM MQ server software. Check system documentation, appliance management interface, or run 'show version' command on the appliance CLI.Affected if The system is an IBM MQ Appliance instance (this CVE does not affect IBM MQ server installations on other platforms).
-
Retrieve the appliance versionAccess the appliance's administrative CLI or web console and locate the version information. In the CLI, use the 'show version' command or check the System Information page in the web UI.Affected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.7, or 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.1, or version 9.1.x where x is less than 9.2.2 (but excluding already-patched 9.1.0.8+ and 9.2.0.2+).
-
Verify the web console is accessibleDetermine whether the IBM MQ Appliance web console (MQ UI) is enabled and accessible. Check via the appliance CLI using 'show http' or review the web console login page availability over HTTPS port 9443 (default).Affected if The web console is enabled and reachable - this is the attack surface for the CSRF vulnerability. If the web console is disabled, the CSRF risk is mitigated.
The environment is affected if it runs IBM MQ Appliance version 9.1.0.0-9.1.0.7 or 9.2.0.0-9.2.0.1 with the web console enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.1.0.89.2.0.29.2.2
Apply IBM's security patch for CVE-2020-4938. In the interim, disable the web console when not in use and implement additional request validation such as checking Origin/Referer headers as a defense-in-depth measure.
IBM MQ Appliance 9.2.2 (or 9.1.0.8 / 9.2.0.2 for respective version branches)
- 1. Back up the IBM MQ Appliance configuration and any critical data before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 2. Review IBM MQ Appliance upgrade documentation for your current version to understand prerequisites and procedures.
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version of IBM MQ Appliance (9.1.0.8, 9.2.0.2, or 9.2.2 or later) from IBM Fix Central or your entitled IBM software repository.
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades may require service downtime.
- 5. Follow IBM's standard upgrade procedure for MQ Appliance, which typically involves uploading the fix pack via the appliance's web console or CLI.
- 6. After upgrade, verify the MQ Appliance is running the fixed version via the web console or 'display version' command.
- 7. Test critical MQ functions and flows to ensure normal operation.
- 8. Validate that the CSRF vulnerability is remediated by confirming the appliance now includes anti-CSRF tokens in forms.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4938 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4938 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data