CVE-2024-25048
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM MQ Appliance 9.3 CD and LTS are vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A remote authenticated attacker could overflow a buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system or cause the server to crash. IBM X-Force ID: 283137.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM MQ Appliance versions 9.3 CD and LTS contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability due to improper bounds checking. A remote authenticated attacker can overflow a heap buffer, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service by crashing the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.3.0.0, < 9.3.0.17>= 9.3.0.0, < 9.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm you are running IBM MQ ApplianceCheck the product type - this vulnerability affects only IBM MQ Appliance, not IBM MQ Server or Client. Verify through appliance console or run 'DSPMQVER' if available, looking for 'Appliance' in the output.Affected if The product is IBM MQ Appliance (different from IBM MQ server/client)
-
Determine the installed IBM MQ Appliance versionAccess the appliance console or use the command line to run the version display command (typically 'version' or through mqsc 'DISPLAY QMGR'). Look for the version string (e.g., 9.3.0.x).Affected if Version is 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.16, or any version below 9.3.5.0 on the LTS track
-
Verify the queue manager is runningCheck if a queue manager is active on the appliance using 'dspmq' or through the appliance interface. The vulnerability requires an authenticated connection to exploit.Affected if A queue manager is running and accepting network connections
-
Check for network-exposed listenersReview listener configurations using 'DISPLAY LISTENER(*)' via mqsc. Determine if the listener port (typically 1414) is accessible from network rather than localhost only.Affected if A listener is configured and reachable from untrusted networks
You are affected if you run IBM MQ Appliance versions 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.16, or 9.3.x versions below 9.3.5, with an active queue manager and accessible network listener.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.3.0.179.3.5
Apply the vendor-supplied patch for IBM MQ Appliance 9.3 CD and LTS. Prior to production deployment, test the update in a non-production environment to verify functionality and schedule during a maintenance window due to the critical nature of the queue manager.
IBM MQ Appliance 9.3.5 (CD) or 9.3.0.17 (LTS)
- 1. Identify the current IBM MQ Appliance version using the command: `show version` or through the web console
- 2. Determine if the deployment is using the Continuous Delivery (CD) or Long Term Support (LTS) release train
- 3. For CD releases: Plan upgrade to version 9.3.5 or later
- 4. For LTS releases: Plan upgrade to version 9.3.0.17 or later
- 5. Download the appropriate fix from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/) or through your IBM entitlement
- 6. Review IBM MQ Appliance upgrade documentation for the specific upgrade procedure
- 7. Perform the upgrade following IBM's standard upgrade process for MQ Appliance
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version with `show version`
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-25048 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-25048 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data