FortinacApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2019-5594

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-08-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.3.6 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") in Fortinet FortiNAC 8.3.0 to 8.3.6 and 8.5.0 admin webUI may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a reflected XSS attack via the search field in the webUI.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiNAC's admin web interface. The search field in the webUI fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code via a crafted URL. When a victim clicks the malicious link and interacts with the search field, the injected script executes in the user's browser context.

MitigationUpdate FortiNAC to a version beyond 8.3.6 or 8.5.0 (or apply vendor-supplied patches). As a compensating control, restrict access to the admin webUI to trusted networks only until the patch can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortinacApplication
Affected:>= 8.3.0, <= 8.3.6= 8.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm FortiNAC installation
    Verify that Fortinet FortiNAC is deployed in your environment. Check your asset inventory or run system commands to identify the product (for example, review running services or installed packages that indicate FortiNAC).
    Affected if FortiNAC is not present in your environment - you are not affected.
  2. Determine installed FortiNAC version
    Access the FortiNAC CLI or admin web interface and retrieve the current software version. Typically available in the system dashboard or via 'get system status' command in CLI.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 8.3.0 through 8.3.6 inclusive, or is exactly 8.5.0 - continue to next check.
  3. Verify admin webUI is network-accessible
    Determine if the FortiNAC admin web interface (typically ports 443 or 8080) is accessible from networks outside your trusted internal segments. Review firewall rules, ACLs, or VPN policies governing access to the webUI.
    Affected if The admin webUI is exposed to untrusted or external networks - the reflected XSS can be triggered via crafted links sent to authenticated users.
  4. Confirm search field is reachable
    Log into the FortiNAC admin web interface and navigate to any page containing the search functionality (such as the global search bar). Verify that user-supplied input in the search field is reflected in the response without proper encoding.
    Affected if The search field reflects unsanitized input in the page output - the vulnerability is present and exploitable.

You are affected if FortiNAC version is 8.3.0-8.3.6 or 8.5.0 AND the admin webUI is accessible to untrusted users who could send malicious links to authenticated administrators.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.3.6
Interim mitigation

Update FortiNAC to a version beyond 8.3.6 or 8.5.0 (or apply vendor-supplied patches). As a compensating control, restrict access to the admin webUI to trusted networks only until the patch can be applied.

Fix this in Fortinac Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5594 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5594 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data