CVE-2019-9850
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLibreOffice is typically bundled with LibreLogo, a programmable turtle vector graphics script, which can execute arbitrary python commands contained with the document it is launched from. LibreOffice also has a feature where documents can specify that pre-installed scripts can be executed on various document script events such as mouse-over, etc. Protection was added, to address CVE-2019-9848, to block calling LibreLogo from script event handers. However an insufficient url validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed malicious to bypass that protection and again trigger calling LibreLogo from script event handlers. This issue affects: Document Foundation LibreOffice versions prior to 6.2.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLibreOffice contains an insufficient URL validation vulnerability that allows bypassing protection (CVE-2019-9848) against calling LibreLogo from script event handlers. Attackers can craft malicious documents that execute arbitrary Python code via LibreLogo when users open the document or trigger script events like mouse-over, leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 16.04= 18.04= 19.04= 8.0= 9.0= 10.0= 29= 30= 15.0= 15.1< 6.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed LibreOffice versionRun 'libreoffice --version' or 'soffice --version' to get the exact version number. Compare it against the affected range: versions prior to 6.2.6 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 6.2.6 (e.g., 6.2.5, 6.1.x, 6.0.x, etc.)
-
Identify LibreLogo availabilityLibreLogo is a macro-enabled component. Check if the LibreLogo toolbar or extension is present by opening LibreOffice Writer, going to View > Toolbars, or look for LibreLogo in the macro library locations.Affected if LibreLogo is enabled or available in the installation and the version is below 6.2.6
-
Verify macro execution settingsCheck the macro security settings in LibreOffice via Tools > Options > Security > Macro Security. Documents exploiting this vulnerability can trigger LibreLogo scripts automatically.Affected if Macro security is set to Medium or Low, allowing automatic script execution on document open or events
-
Inspect document for suspicious macrosIf you have received a document from an untrusted source, inspect its macros: in LibreOffice, go to Tools > Macros > Organize Macros > LibreOffice Basic, or examine the document package as a ZIP archive for embedded scripts.Affected if The document contains LibreLogo or Python scripts in event handler bindings that could execute arbitrary code
You are affected if LibreOffice version is below 6.2.6 AND LibreLogo is available/enabled, particularly if opening documents from untrusted sources is common.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.6
Update to LibreOffice 6.2.6 or later to patch the insufficient URL validation. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling LibreLogo or restricting script execution capabilities as a defense-in-depth measure.
LibreOffice 6.2.6 or later (or distribution-provided patches for versions 6.2.x, 6.3.x, 6.4.x that include the fix)
- Update your system's package repository to ensure you have the latest package lists
- Apply the LibreOffice update through your system's package manager: For Ubuntu/Debian: 'sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade libreoffice'
- For Fedora: 'sudo dnf update libreoffice'
- For openSUSE Leap: 'sudo zypper update libreoffice'
- After updating, verify the installed LibreOffice version is 6.2.6 or later by opening LibreOffice and going to Help > About LibreOffice
- Alternatively, verify via command line: 'libreoffice --version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-9850 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-9850 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data