CVE-2020-0543
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncomplete cleanup from specific special register read operations in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCVE-2020-0543 is a hardware vulnerability in certain Intel processors where incomplete cleanup from specific special register read operations may allow an authenticated local user to potentially disclose information. The vulnerability stems from residual data remaining in CPU registers after certain read operations are performed, which could be accessed by malicious local actors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 18.04= 19.10= 20.04= 31= 32all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CPU modelRun 'lscpu' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' and look for the model name in the 'Model name' fieldAffected if The CPU model is one of: Celeron 1000m, Celeron 1005m, Celeron 1007u, Celeron 1017u, Celeron 1019y, or Celeron 1020e
-
Check Ubuntu versionRun 'lsb_release -a' or check '/etc/lsb-release' on Ubuntu systemsAffected if The version is 12.04, 14.04, 16.04, 18.04, 19.10, or 20.04
-
Check Fedora versionRun 'cat /etc/fedora-release' on Fedora systemsAffected if The version is 31 or 32
-
Verify microcode versionCheck if Intel microcode updates are loaded: 'dmesg | grep -i microcode' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' looking for 'microcode' version fieldAffected if The microcode version is older than the latest Intel-provided update for the affected CPU model (compare against Intel's microcode release notes)
A user is affected if they run an affected Ubuntu or Fedora version on one of the listed Intel Celeron processors AND have not updated the CPU microcode/firmware to the patched version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Intel processor microcode and firmware updates (BIOS updates) as provided by Intel and system OEMs. Contact hardware vendors for available patches. This is a low-level CPU vulnerability that requires firmware/microcode updates rather than software patching.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-0543 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.intel.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.openwall.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- kc.mcafee.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-0543 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data