Mir100 FirmwareOperating system · Mobile Industrial Robots

CVE-2020-10280

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.8.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Apache server on port 80 that host the web interface is vulnerable to a DoS by spamming incomplete HTTP headers, effectively blocking the access to the dashboard.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Apache HTTP Server listening on port 80 that hosts the web interface is vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack. An attacker can send multiple incomplete HTTP headers to exhaust server resources and block access to the dashboard.

MitigationImplement Apache request filtering and timeout configurations to drop incomplete headers; consider rate limiting or a WAF in front of the Apache server.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mir100 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 2.8.1.1
Mir200 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Mir250 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Mir500 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Mir1000 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Er200 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Er Lite FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Er Flex FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model and firmware version
    Access the device admin panel or use the command line interface to retrieve the exact model number (e.g., Mir100, Mir200, Mir250, Mir500, Mir1000, Er200, Er Lite, Er Flex) and firmware version. On Mir robots, this is typically found in the web interface under 'System' or 'Settings' or via the robot's local display.
    Affected if The device is a Mir100 with firmware <= 2.8.1.1, or any Mir200, Mir250, Mir500, Mir1000, Er200, Er Lite, or Er Flex regardless of firmware version.
  2. Verify Apache HTTP Server is running on port 80
    Attempt to access the device web interface by browsing to http://[device-ip]:80 or http://[device-ip]. Check if the Apache landing page or robot dashboard loads. You can also run 'netstat -an | grep :80' or 'curl -v http://localhost:80' from the device console if you have shell access.
    Affected if The Apache server on port 80 is exposed and reachable.
  3. Check Apache configuration for header handling settings
    If you have console or SSH access to the device, examine the Apache configuration files (typically in /etc/apache2/ or /etc/httpd/). Look for directives related to TimeOut, LimitRequestFields, LimitRequestFieldSize, and Header parsing behavior.
    Affected if The Apache configuration lacks proper timeout limits or request field restrictions for handling incomplete headers.
  4. Test for vulnerability with crafted incomplete headers
    Send incomplete HTTP headers to the device using a tool like netcat: 'echo -e "GET / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: target\r\n" | nc target 80'. Repeat this multiple times and observe if the server becomes unresponsive or exhibits delayed responses.
    Affected if The server becomes slow, unresponsive, or drops connections after receiving incomplete headers.

A user is affected if they have a Mir100 device on firmware 2.8.1.1 or lower, or any Mir200, Mir250, Mir500, Mir1000, Er200, Er Lite, or Er Flex device with the web interface (Apache on port 80) accessible, and the Apache configuration does not enforce strict header timeout and field limits.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.8.1.1
Interim mitigation

Implement Apache request filtering and timeout configurations to drop incomplete headers; consider rate limiting or a WAF in front of the Apache server.

Fix this in Mir100 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-10280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-10280 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data