FortinacApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2020-12816

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.7.3 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in FortiNAC before 8.7.2 may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the UserID of Admin Users.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiNAC versions before 8.7.2 allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject malicious JavaScript code through the UserID field when creating or modifying Admin Users. The injected payload executes in the browsers of other administrators who view the admin user management interface.

MitigationUpgrade FortiNAC to version 8.7.2 or later to receive the vendor patch. Alternatively, apply the specific Fortinet hotfix if available, and implement input validation/sanitization on the UserID field as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortinacApplication
Affected:< 8.7.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm FortiNAC is deployed in your environment
    Identify FortiNAC installations by checking for FortiNAC Control Center, FortiNAC portal services, or FortiNAC servers on your network. Look for the FortiNAC web interface (typically on port 8443 or 8080) or check running services on known FortiNAC hosts.
    Affected if FortiNAC software is not present in your environment, you are not affected.
  2. Determine the installed FortiNAC version
    Log into the FortiNAC administrative interface (FortiNAC Control Center or direct FortiNAC access). Navigate to System > Settings > General or use the CLI command 'get system status' to retrieve the firmware version. Compare the version number against the affected range (versions before 8.7.3).
    Affected if The installed version is 8.7.2 or earlier, or any version below 8.7.3, indicating the vulnerability exists in your environment.
  3. Verify admin user management feature is accessible
    Confirm you have access to the Admin User management interface within FortiNAC. Navigate to System > Administrator > Administrators or similar path depending on your version. This feature must be available and accessible for the XSS to be exploitable.
    Affected if The admin user management interface is not accessible or does not exist in your deployment, the specific attack vector is not applicable.
  4. Inspect existing admin UserID fields for suspicious content
    Review all admin user accounts in the Administrator list. Examine the 'UserID' or 'Username' fields for any unexpected characters, scripts, or patterns such as '<script>', 'javascript:', or HTML tags that could indicate a previously injected payload.
    Affected if Any admin user account displays a UserID containing script tags, JavaScript event handlers, or other XSS payloads, indicating active exploitation or prior injection.

You are affected if FortiNAC version 8.7.2 or earlier (below 8.7.3) is installed AND the admin user management interface is accessible in your environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.7.3 or later
Fixed in 8.7.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiNAC to version 8.7.2 or later to receive the vendor patch. Alternatively, apply the specific Fortinet hotfix if available, and implement input validation/sanitization on the UserID field as a defense-in-depth measure.

Fix this in Fortinac Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12816 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data