CVE-2020-12944
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient validation of BIOS image length by ASP Firmware could lead to arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a firmware vulnerability in ASP (AMD Secure Processor) Firmware where insufficient validation of BIOS image length could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the pre-OS environment, potentially leading to full system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.gCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed AMD Epyc processor modelRun a system information command such as 'dmidecode -t processor' or check the system inventory to determine the exact AMD Epyc CPU model number (e.g., 7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p)Affected if The processor is one of the affected Epyc models listed in the CVE (7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p)
-
Check the AMD Secure Processor firmware versionUse an AMD-provided tool or UEFI/BIOS interface to query the ASP firmware version. The version string follows the format 'naplespi-sp3_X.Y.Z.W' where the full version string is displayedAffected if The displayed ASP firmware version is a version string that begins with 'naplespi-sp3_' and is lexicographically or numerically less than 'naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g'
-
Confirm the BIOS image length validation behaviorThis check requires examining the firmware behavior or release notes. The vulnerability exists specifically when the ASP firmware does not properly validate BIOS image length before loading, which is inherent to all versions prior to the patched releaseAffected if The installed ASP firmware version is any build earlier than naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g, indicating the validation fix has not been applied
A system is affected if it contains an AMD Epyc processor from the listed models AND is running ASP firmware version earlier than naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the ASP Firmware to a version that properly validates BIOS image length. This typically requires applying a BIOS/UEFI update from the system vendor that includes the patched ASP firmware.
naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g or later firmware version
- Identify the specific AMD Epyc processor model (7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p) in your system
- Check the current firmware version by accessing the BMC/IPMI interface or using AMD's system management tools
- Navigate to www.amd.com and locate the firmware download section for AMD Epyc processors
- Download the Naplespi-sp3 firmware version naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g or later for your specific processor model
- Review AMD's firmware update documentation and ensure the system is properly backed up
- Apply the firmware update through the BMC/IPMI interface or using AMD's recommended update procedure, following all safety warnings
- After update completion, verify the firmware version has been successfully updated to naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12944 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data