CVE-2021-26322
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPersistent platform private key may not be protected with a random IV leading to a potential “two time pad attack”.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA persistent platform private key is being protected using encryption without a random Initialization Vector (IV). When the same IV is reused (or a predictable IV is used), encrypting identical plaintexts produces identical ciphertexts, allowing attackers to perform cryptanalysis, detect patterns, and potentially recover plaintext through ciphertext comparison - known as a two-time pad style attack.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.gCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor modelRun 'dmidecode -s processor-family' or check /proc/cpuinfo to confirm the exact CPU model (e.g., 7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p)Affected if The processor is one of: Epyc 7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p
-
Check the system firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or access the BIOS/UEFI setup to view the firmware version, then compare against 'naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g'Affected if The firmware version is earlier than naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g (e.g., naplespi-sp3_0.x.x or any version lacking the 'g' revision)
-
Verify if platform private key storage is in useExamine the system for stored platform keys: on Linux check /root/.ssh/ or certificate stores, or review any TPM/secure key storage configurations using 'tpmtool getkey' or vendor toolsAffected if Platform private keys are stored on the system and were provisioned using the affected firmware versions
-
Inspect the key encryption mechanismIf keys exist, use vendor-provided key management tools or analyze the stored key blobs to determine if they were encrypted without randomized IVs (identical plaintext produces identical ciphertext)Affected if Encrypted platform keys show patterns indicating reuse of encryption IVs across multiple key installations
A user is affected if they have an AMD Epyc 7000 series processor (specifically 7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p) running firmware version earlier than naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g and have platform private keys stored that may have been encrypted without proper IV randomization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement randomized IV generation for all encryption operations of the persistent private key, ensuring each encryption produces a unique IV that is stored alongside the ciphertext. Consider using authenticated encryption modes (like GCM) that inherently require unique IVs.
naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the affected AMD Epyc processor (7601, 7551p, 7551, 7501, 7451, 7401, 7371, or 7351p) using the system management interface or BIOS/firmware update utility.
- 2. Navigate to the AMD support website (www.amd.com) or the OEM server manufacturer support portal to obtain the firmware update.
- 3. Download the naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g firmware update or later version specifically for your Epyc processor model.
- 4. Apply the firmware update following the standard BMC/BIOS firmware update procedure for your server platform (this typically requires administrator/root privileges and may require a system reboot).
- 5. After the update completes, verify the firmware version has been successfully updated to naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g or later.
- 6. Confirm the platform private key is now protected with a random initialization vector (IV) as per the security fix.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26322 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data