CVE-2020-12951
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRace condition in ASP firmware could allow less privileged x86 code to perform ASP SMM (System Management Mode) operations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition in AMD ASP (Application Service Provider) firmware enables lower-privileged x86 code to execute System Management Mode (SMM) operations, violating the security boundary between user/kernel mode and the highest-privilege SMM. This represents a privilege escalation vulnerability allowing code to escape its privilege level and perform SMM-level operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AMD Epyc processor modelRun `dmidecode -t processor` or check `/proc/cpuinfo` to identify the exact AMD Epyc processor variant (7003, 7002, 7001, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, or 73f3)Affected if The processor is any AMD Epyc model listed in the affected products (7003, 7002, 7001, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, or 73f3)
-
Retrieve current ASP firmware versionRun `dmidecode -s bios-version` or access the system firmware/BIOS setup to locate the ASP firmware version string (may appear as milanpi-sp3, romepi-sp3, or naplespi-sp3 variant)Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or the installed version is unknown
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangesMatch your identified Epyc model and firmware version to the affected version thresholdsAffected if For Epyc 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, or 73f3: version < milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4; For Epyc 7002: version < romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c; For Epyc 7001: version < naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g
-
Verify ASP feature is enabledCheck system configuration or firmware settings for the Application Service Provider (ASP) module status; this is typically a firmware-level feature that may be listed in BIOS/UEFI settings or system management interfacesAffected if ASP feature is enabled on a system with vulnerable firmware version, as the race condition only applies when ASP is active
The system is affected if it uses an AMD Epyc 7003/7002/7001/72f3/7313/7313p/7343/73f3 processor with ASP firmware below the specified version thresholds and has the ASP feature enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply AMD firmware updates addressing the ASP race condition; verify that systems require appropriate privilege levels for SMM access after patching.
Upgrade to firmware version milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (Epyc 7003), romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c (Epyc 7002), or naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g (Epyc 7001) or later as appropriate for your processor
- 1. Identify the exact Epyc processor model (7003, 7002, 7001, or specific variant like 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3) in the affected system
- 2. Determine the current firmware version installed on the system
- 3. Download the corresponding BIOS/firmware update from the AMD support website for the specific Epyc model
- 4. For Epyc 7003 (Milan): Update to firmware version milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 or later
- 5. For Epyc 7002 (Rome): Update to firmware version romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c or later
- 6. For Epyc 7001 (Naples): Update to firmware version naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g or later
- 7. Apply the firmware update following the server manufacturer's documented firmware update procedure
- 8. Verify the firmware version has been successfully applied after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12951 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12951 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data