CVE-2021-26335
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper input and range checking in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) boot loader image header may allow an attacker to use attacker-controlled values prior to signature validation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability exists in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) boot loader image header where improper input and range checking allows attacker-controlled values to be used before cryptographic signature validation, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution at the firmware level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AMD Epyc processor modelRun `dmidecode -t processor` or `lscpu | grep 'Model name'` to confirm the processor is an AMD Epyc 7001, 7002, 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, or 73f3Affected if Processor model matches any of the affected Epyc series listed in the CVE (7001, 7002, 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3)
-
Locate AMD Secure Processor firmware versionAccess the system BIOS/UEFI setup utility and navigate to the AMD Secure Processor configuration section, or use `dmidecode -t bios` to look for ASP firmware information if exposedAffected if The ASP firmware version is visible and can be compared against the affected versions
-
Compare ASP firmware version to affected rangesCheck the firmware version string against the vulnerable versions: milanpi-sp3 versions < 1.0.0.4, romepi-sp3 versions < 1.0.0.c, naplespi-sp3 versions < 1.0.0.g. Match the firmware variant to your processor generation (milanpi for 7003/72f3/73f3/7313 series, romepi for 7002, naplespi for 7001)Affected if The installed ASP firmware version is lower than the specified minimum version for your processor's firmware family
A system is affected if it contains an AMD Epyc 7001, 7002, 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, or 73f3 processor with AMD Secure Processor firmware below the specified version thresholds (1.0.0.4, 1.0.0.c, or 1.0.0.g depending on the firmware family).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply AMD-provided firmware updates for the Secure Processor to remediate this vulnerability; verify that affected systems receive the patch through standard patch management or firmware update processes.
milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (Epyc 7003/72f3/7313/7313p/7343/73f3), romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c (Epyc 7002), or naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g (Epyc 7001)
- 1. Identify the specific AMD Epyc processor model in the affected system (7001/Naples, 7002/Rome, or 7003/Milan family)
- 2. Check the current firmware version by accessing the BIOS/UEFI settings or using system management tools like IPMI, iLO, or AMD's firmware update utilities
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware update from the AMD website (www.amd.com) for the specific Epyc model
- 4. Apply the firmware update following AMD's standard firmware update procedure, typically through BIOS flash, AMDs UpdateGA firmware update tool, or via BMC/IPMI interface
- 5. Verify the firmware was successfully updated to the fixed version (milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 for Epyc 7003/72f3/7313/7313p/7343/73f3, romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c for Epyc 7002, or naplespi-sp3_1.0.0.g for Epyc 7001)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26335 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data