CVE-2020-15220
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCombodo iTop is a web based IT Service Management tool. In iTop before versions 2.7.2 and 3.0.0, two cookies are created for the same session, which leads to a possibility to steal user session. This is fixed in versions 2.7.2 and 3.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Combodo iTop before versions 2.7.2 and 3.0.0, the application creates two separate cookies for the same user session, creating a session fixation/ Hijacking vulnerability that allows an attacker to steal the user's session and impersonate legitimate users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.7.2= 3.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed iTop versionLocate the version file or check the application footer/dashboard for the iTop version number. Common locations include a version.php file in the root directory or the about page in the admin interface.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.7.2 or exactly equals 3.0.0
-
Verify session cookie configurationLog into the iTop application and inspect the HTTP response headers using browser developer tools or a command-line tool like curl. Look for Set-Cookie headers that set session identifiers.Affected if Multiple Set-Cookie headers with different session-related names are returned for a single login request
-
Capture session cookie behaviorClear existing cookies, perform a fresh login to iTop, and capture the complete HTTP response. Use curl -v or browser Network tab to examine all cookies being set.Affected if The application sets more than one distinct session cookie (e.g., both a PHP default session cookie and a custom application session cookie)
You are affected if your installed iTop version is below 2.7.2 or exactly 3.0.0 AND the application creates duplicate session cookies during authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.7.2
Upgrade iTop to version 2.7.2 or 3.0.0 or later to apply the patch that corrects the duplicate session cookie handling.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15220 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15220 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data