Rpki Validator 3Application · Ripe

CVE-2020-16163

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-07-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in RIPE NCC RPKI Validator 3.x before 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28. RRDP fetches proceed even with a lack of validation of a TLS HTTPS endpoint. This allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions, or to trigger denial of service to traffic directed to co-dependent routing systems. NOTE: third parties assert that the behavior is intentionally permitted by RFC 8182

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The RIPE NCC RPKI Validator 3.x fails to validate TLS/HTTPS endpoints during RRDP (RPKI Repository Delta Protocol) fetches. This allows remote attackers to trigger unvalidated connections to arbitrary endpoints, enabling bypass of intended access restrictions or denial of service against co-dependent routing systems that rely on RPKI validation data.

MitigationUpgrade RPKI Validator to version 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 or later, which implements proper TLS endpoint validation for RRDP transfers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rpki Validator 3Application
Affected:>= 3.0, <= 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm RIPE RPKI Validator installation
    Locate the RIPE RPKI Validator application on the system, typically installed in a directory named 'ripe-rpki-validator' or similar, or check running processes for 'rpki-validator'
    Affected if The software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Access the Validator web interface (default port 8080) and navigate to the About or Settings page to view the version number, or check version files in the installation directory
    Affected if Version displays as 3.0 through 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 inclusive
  3. Verify RRDP fetch feature is enabled
    Check the Validator configuration for RRDP (RPKI Repository Delta Protocol) settings - look for RRDP repository URLs configured under TAL or repository settings in the web interface or configuration files
    Affected if RRDP is enabled and configured with one or more RRDP server URLs
  4. Confirm version is within affected range
    Compare the identified version against the vulnerable range: versions >= 3.0 and <= 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 are affected
    Affected if Installed version falls within 3.0 to 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 AND RRDP is enabled

User is affected if RIPE RPKI Validator version 3.0 through 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 is installed with RRDP feature enabled, as this combination allows unvalidated connections to arbitrary HTTPS endpoints during RRDP fetches.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28
Interim mitigation

Upgrade RPKI Validator to version 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 or later, which implements proper TLS endpoint validation for RRDP transfers.

Recommended fix High confidence

3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of RPKI Validator 3.x
  2. 2. Download RPKI Validator version 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28 or a later stable release from the official RIPE NCC repository
  3. 3. Follow the RIPE NCC upgrade instructions to install the fixed version
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful and confirm RRDP fetches now properly validate TLS certificates

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Rpki Validator 3 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-16163 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-16163 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data