KeycloakApplication · Redhat

CVE-2020-1698

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in keycloak in versions before 9.0.0. A logged exception in the HttpMethod class may leak the password given as parameter. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Keycloak versions before 9.0.0, the HttpMethod class logs exception details that include password parameters passed as method arguments. This causes sensitive credentials to be written to application logs, exposing them to anyone with log access.

MitigationUpgrade Keycloak to version 9.0.0 or later, which contains the fix that prevents password parameters from being included in logged exceptions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
KeycloakApplication
Affected:< 9.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Keycloak version
    Locate the Keycloak installation directory and check the version file or startup logs. Common locations include the 'README' file, 'version' file in the root directory, or the server startup banner which displays the version number on startup.
    Affected if The installed version is any release before 9.0.0 (e.g., 8.x, 7.x, 6.x series).
  2. Examine application log files for password parameters
    Search Keycloak log files (typically found in $KEYCLOAK_HOME/standalone/log/ or similar log directories) for strings matching password-related parameter names such as 'password', 'passwd', 'credential', or similar terms that may have been logged during HTTP requests or exception handling.
    Affected if Log files contain any plaintext or partially masked password values that were passed as method arguments when exceptions occurred.
  3. Review HttpMethod class behavior
    Inspect the Keycloak source code or decompiled classes for the HttpMethod implementation. Look for logging statements that output method arguments without filtering out sensitive parameters, particularly in exception handling code paths.
    Affected if The HttpMethod class contains logging logic that outputs method arguments including password parameters to the application logs.
  4. Verify log configuration for sensitive data masking
    Check the logging configuration file (typically logback.xml or log4j configuration) to determine whether there are filters or custom layouts configured to mask or exclude sensitive parameters like passwords from log output.
    Affected if No sensitive data filters are configured, or the existing filters do not cover password-type parameters in exception logging.

You are affected if your Keycloak installation is version 8.x or earlier and your application logs contain any exposed password or credential values from HTTP method arguments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.0.0 or later
Fixed in 9.0.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Keycloak to version 9.0.0 or later, which contains the fix that prevents password parameters from being included in logged exceptions.

Fix this in Keycloak Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1698 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data