KeycloakApplication · Redhat

CVE-2020-1725

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-01-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 13.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in keycloak before version 13.0.0. In some scenarios a user still has access to a resource after changing the role mappings in Keycloak and after expiration of the previous access token.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Keycloak before version 13.0.0 contains a flaw where user access to resources persists even after role mappings are changed and the previous access token expires. This suggests a caching or session state issue where the authorization decision is not properly re-evaluated when role mappings are modified.

MitigationUpgrade Keycloak to version 13.0.0 or later to resolve the role mapping synchronization issue.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
KeycloakApplication
Affected:< 13.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Keycloak version
    Check the version file in the Keycloak installation directory, or query the /health/ready endpoint, or run: 'keycloak/bin/kc.sh --version' from the server root
    Affected if The installed version is any version before 13.0.0 (e.g., 12.x, 11.x, 10.x)
  2. Locate the cache configuration file
    Find the infinispan cache configuration file (usually in standalone/configuration/standalone.xml or standalone-ha.xml under the <cache-container> and <replicated-cache> elements for sessions)
    Affected if The default Infinispan cache configuration is in use without any custom invalidation settings for session or authorization caches
  3. Inspect the session cache eviction settings
    In the cache configuration file, look for the 'session-cache' or 'sessions' cache definition and check for <expiration> settings and eviction configuration
    Affected if The session cache has no time-based expiration or the eviction settings are configured such that old role mappings may be retained in cache after role changes
  4. Check for authentication session configuration
    Look for 'authenticationSessionCache' or 'userSessionCache' entries in the Infinispan cache configuration
    Affected if The user session cache is configured with long-lived entries that do not synchronize with role mapping changes in the underlying user storage
  5. Verify token validity and refresh behavior
    Test by obtaining an access token, changing the user's role mappings in the Keycloak admin console, waiting for the token to expire, then requesting a new token to see if old access persists
    Affected if After role mappings are modified and the original token expires, a newly issued token still grants access based on the old (revoked) role mappings

You are affected if your Keycloak version is below 13.0.0 and users can still access resources with old roles after those roles have been removed and their tokens have expired.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 13.0.0 or later
Fixed in 13.0.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Keycloak to version 13.0.0 or later to resolve the role mapping synchronization issue.

Fix this in Keycloak Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,120
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1725 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data