Nip6800 FirmwareOperating system · Huawei

CVE-2020-1858

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-02-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Huawei products NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100; Secospace USG6600 versions V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100; and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00SPC100 have a denial of service vulnerability. Attackers need to perform a series of operations in a special scenario to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploit may cause the new connections can't be established, result in a denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a denial of service vulnerability in Huawei NIP6800, USG6600, and USG9500 security appliances. Successful exploitation prevents new connections from being established, effectively blocking legitimate traffic. The attack requires a specific series of operations in a particular scenario, suggesting it may involve malformed packets or specific connection states.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches or firmware updates from Huawei for the affected versions. As a defense-in-depth measure, implement connection rate limiting and consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nip6800 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= v500r001c30= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100
Secospace Usg6600 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100
Usg9500 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c60spc500= v500r005c00spc100

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Log into the device CLI or management interface and run 'display device' or check the hardware label to confirm the model is one of: NIP6800, USG6600, or USG9500
    Affected if The device model is not NIP6800, USG6600, or USG9500 (other models are not affected by this CVE)
  2. Check the firmware version
    Run 'display version' in the device CLI or check the firmware version in the management interface
    Affected if The firmware version matches one of: v500r001c30, v500r001c30spc200, v500r001c30spc600, v500r001c60spc500, v500r005c00spc100
  3. Confirm the device is processing traffic
    Run 'display ip interface brief' or 'display zone' to verify that interfaces are configured and active, and check that the device is not in bypass mode
    Affected if The device is actively processing network traffic (the vulnerability affects new connection establishment)
  4. Verify if the vulnerability trigger scenario is possible
    Review the security policy configuration with 'display security-policy all' to check if the device accepts connections from untrusted networks (the CVE mentions a specific scenario involving malformed packets or specific connection states)
    Affected if Security policies allow traffic from untrusted sources to reach the device without proper filtering

The device is affected if it is a NIP6800, USG6600, or USG9500 running one of the listed firmware versions and is actively processing traffic from potentially untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches or firmware updates from Huawei for the affected versions. As a defense-in-depth measure, implement connection rate limiting and consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.

Fix this in Nip6800 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1858 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1858 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data