CVE-2020-2033
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen the pre-logon feature is enabled, a missing certification validation in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app can disclose the pre-logon authentication cookie to a man-in-the-middle attacker on the same local area network segment with the ability to manipulate ARP or to conduct ARP spoofing attacks. This allows the attacker to access the GlobalProtect Server as allowed by configured Security rules for the 'pre-login' user. This access may be limited compared to the network access of regular users. This issue affects: GlobalProtect app 5.0 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.0.10 when the prelogon feature is enabled; GlobalProtect app 5.1 versions earlier than GlobalProtect app 5.1.4 when the prelogon feature is enabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMissing certificate validation in Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect app allows a man-in-the-middle attacker on the same LAN segment (with ARP manipulation capability) to steal the pre-logon authentication cookie. This grants the attacker access to the GlobalProtect Server with pre-login user privileges, which may have limited but non-zero network access compared to regular authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.10>= 5.1.0, < 5.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify GlobalProtect app version on endpointsOn Windows, open Programs and Features or check C:\Program Files\Palo Alto Networks\GlobalProtect\version.txt. On macOS, run 'defaults read /Applications/GlobalProtect.app/Contents/Info CFBundleVersion' or check the app info in System Preferences.Affected if The installed version is 5.0.0 through 5.0.9, or 5.1.0 through 5.1.3 (versions below 5.0.10 or 5.1.4).
-
Determine if pre-logon authentication is configuredOn the Palo Alto Networks firewall or Panorama management console, go to GlobalProtect > Portals > select your portal > Agent > Pre-logon. Check if a Pre-logon Configuration is assigned to the agent.Affected if Pre-logon is enabled and configured, as this is the feature that exposes the authentication cookie during the pre-login phase.
-
Check GlobalProtect client configuration for certificate validation settingsOn the endpoint, examine the GlobalProtect client configuration file (typically in %ProgramData%\Palo Alto Networks\GlobalProtect\ on Windows or /Library/Application Support/GlobalProtect/ on macOS). Look for settings related to certificate validation or server certificate verification.Affected if Certificate validation is disabled or set to optional, allowing MITM attacks without proper server verification.
-
Review network segment exposureAssess whether endpoints are on network segments where an attacker could perform ARP manipulation. This includes shared Ethernet hubs, unsecured WiFi networks, or VLANs with untrusted systems.Affected if Endpoints are on shared or untrusted network segments where ARP poisoning or MITM attacks are plausible, combined with vulnerable GlobalProtect versions.
You are affected if GlobalProtect app versions 5.0.0-5.0.9 or 5.1.0-5.1.3 are installed AND pre-logon authentication is enabled, making the pre-logon cookie susceptible to theft via MITM attacks on your network segment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.0.105.1.4
Upgrade GlobalProtect app to version 5.0.10 or later (for 5.x) or 5.1.4 or later (for 5.1.x), or disable the pre-logon feature if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2033 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data