MicollabApplication · Mitel

CVE-2020-25609

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-12-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.2 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The NuPoint Messenger Portal of Mitel MiCollab before 9.2 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary scripts due to insufficient input validation, aka XSS. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to view and modify user data.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The NuPoint Messenger Portal in Mitel MiCollab versions prior to 9.2 contains a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability due to insufficient input validation. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious scripts into user input fields that execute in the browsers of other users viewing that content, potentially allowing unauthorized access to session data and modification of user information.

MitigationUpgrade Mitel MiCollab to version 9.2 or later to obtain the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied data within the NuPoint Messenger Portal.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MicollabApplication
Affected:< 9.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Mitel MiCollab installation
    Locate the MiCollab installation directory or check for the MiCollab service running on the system. Common paths include C:\Program Files\Mitel\MiCollab or /opt/mitel/micollab. On Windows, check Services for 'Mitel MiCollab' service.
    Affected if Mitel MiCollab software is found on the system
  2. Identify installed MiCollab version
    Check the installed version of MiCollab. This can typically be found in the application itself under Help > About, in the Windows Programs and Features list, or by examining version files in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 9.2 (e.g., 9.1, 9.0, 8.x, etc.)
  3. Verify NuPoint Messenger Portal is enabled
    Access the MiCollab administration console and check whether the NuPoint Messenger Portal component is enabled and accessible. This is typically found under Services or Portal configuration settings in the admin interface.
    Affected if NuPoint Messenger Portal is enabled and accessible to users
  4. Confirm user authentication to portal is possible
    Determine whether the NuPoint Messenger Portal allows user authentication and input submission. This includes checking if user accounts can log in to the portal and submit content such as messages, profiles, or other user-defined fields.
    Affected if Authenticated users can access and submit data to the NuPoint Messenger Portal

The environment is affected if Mitel MiCollab is installed with a version prior to 9.2 AND the NuPoint Messenger Portal component is enabled and accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.2 or later
Fixed in 9.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Mitel MiCollab to version 9.2 or later to obtain the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied data within the NuPoint Messenger Portal.

Fix this in Micollab Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-25609 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-25609 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data