Play FrameworkApplication · Lightbend

CVE-2020-27196

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-11-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.8.2 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in PlayJava in Play Framework 2.6.0 through 2.8.2. The body parsing of HTTP requests eagerly parses a payload given a Content-Type header. A deep JSON structure sent to a valid POST endpoint (that may or may not expect JSON payloads) causes a StackOverflowError and Denial of Service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Play Framework body parser eagerly parses HTTP request payloads based solely on the Content-Type header, without validating whether the endpoint actually expects that content type. When a deeply nested JSON structure is sent to any POST endpoint, the recursive parsing triggers a StackOverflowError, causing denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade to Play Framework 2.8.3 or later where the vulnerability is patched, or implement body parser size/depth limits and input validation on all POST endpoints to reject excessively nested JSON structures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Play FrameworkApplication
Affected:<= 2.6.25>= 2.7.0, <= 2.7.5>= 2.8.0, <= 2.8.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Play Framework version in use
    Inspect your build configuration files (build.sbt, build.gradle, or pom.xml) for the playframework or play dependency version. Also check the Play console output on startup, which typically displays the framework version.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.6.x through 2.6.25, 2.7.x through 2.7.5, or 2.8.x through 2.8.2.
  2. Locate POST endpoints that accept JSON content
    Review your conf/routes file and look for POST or PUT routes that specify json as the body parser (e.g., controllers.Application.submit() with anyJson). Also scan controller action methods that explicitly use anyJson, parseJson, or accept the default body parser which auto-parses based on Content-Type.
    Affected if Any route or action method accepts JSON request bodies without explicit depth or size limits.
  3. Confirm the body parser auto-parses based on Content-Type
    Check your action definitions for the use of default body parsers like anyContent, anyJson, or no explicit body parser. In Play, when no explicit parser is specified or when using parse.tolerantJson/parse.json, the parser activates purely based on the Content-Type header without validation of endpoint expectations.
    Affected if Endpoints use anyJson, anyContent, or rely on Play's default Content-Type-based parsing without explicit depth limiting configured.
  4. Verify whether depth or size limits are configured
    Inspect your application.conf for play.parsers.json.* settings, specifically look for keys like play.parsers.json.maxDepth or similar limit configurations. Also check if custom body parsers with depth/size restrictions have been implemented in your controllers.
    Affected if No play.parsers.json.maxDepth or equivalent limit is configured, leaving the default recursive parsing behavior exposed.

Your environment is affected if you run Play Framework version 2.6.x through 2.6.25, 2.7.x through 2.7.5, or 2.8.x through 2.8.2 and have POST endpoints that accept JSON without depth limits configured in the body parser.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.8.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Play Framework 2.8.3 or later where the vulnerability is patched, or implement body parser size/depth limits and input validation on all POST endpoints to reject excessively nested JSON structures.

Fix this in Play Framework Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
36.0 hours of engineering $6,400
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27196 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data