Factorytalk LinxApplication · Rockwellautomation

CVE-2020-27251

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-11-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.11 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A heap overflow vulnerability exists within FactoryTalk Linx Version 6.11 and prior. This vulnerability could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to send malicious port ranges, which could result in remote code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A heap overflow vulnerability in FactoryTalk Linx versions 6.11 and prior allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to send malicious port ranges, potentially achieving remote code execution on affected systems.

MitigationApply the vendor-provided patch for FactoryTalk Linx when available; in the interim, implement network segmentation and restrict external access to affected systems to reduce attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Factorytalk LinxApplication
Affected:<= 6.11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify FactoryTalk Linx is installed
    Check the Windows installed programs list via Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-ItemProperty HKLM:\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\* | Select-Object DisplayName, DisplayVersion' in PowerShell to list installed software and look for FactoryTalk Linx
    Affected if FactoryTalk Linx appears in the installed programs list
  2. Determine the installed version number
    Locate the FactoryTalk Linx installation directory (typically in C:\Program Files\Rockwell Software\FactoryTalk Linx or similar) and check the version info of the executable, or look in Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Rockwell Software\FactoryTalk Linx for the Version entry
    Affected if The version is 6.11 or lower, or if no version can be determined but FactoryTalk Linx is present
  3. Check if the FactoryTalk Linx service is running and listening on network ports
    Open Command Prompt and run 'netstat -ano | findstr LISTENING' to see listening ports, or use PowerShell 'Get-NetTCPConnection -State Listen' to list all listening ports. FactoryTalk Linx typically uses ports in the 47808/UDP range for EtherNet/IP communications
    Affected if FactoryTalk Linx ports are in a listening state and bound to network interfaces accessible from other systems
  4. Verify network exposure of the affected service
    Check if the machine hosting FactoryTalk Linx is directly accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules (run 'netsh advfirewall firewall show rule name=all' or check Windows Firewall settings), and determine if the affected ports are open to external IPs or the internet
    Affected if Firewall rules allow inbound connections to FactoryTalk Linx ports from untrusted network segments or the internet

The environment is affected if FactoryTalk Linx version 6.11 or prior is installed, running, and its network ports are accessible to remote, unauthenticated attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.11
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-provided patch for FactoryTalk Linx when available; in the interim, implement network segmentation and restrict external access to affected systems to reduce attack surface.

Fix this in Factorytalk Linx Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27251 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27251 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data