CVE-2020-3185
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (TMS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting malicious data in a specific data field in the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected web-based management interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco TelePresence Management Suite web-based management interface due to insufficient input validation. An authenticated attacker can insert malicious script into specific data fields, allowing execution of arbitrary JavaScript in users' browsers or access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 15.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco TelePresence Management Suite is installedLocate the TMS software on the system. Common paths: Windows: C:\Program Files\Cisco Systems\TMS\ or Linux: /opt/cisco/tms/. Check for running process 'TMS' or 'Tomcat' (used by TMS web interface).Affected if The software is present and running on the system.
-
Identify the installed TMS versionAccess the web management interface at https://<tms-host>/tms or check version file at C:\Program Files\Cisco Systems\TMS\version.properties (Windows) or /opt/cisco/tms/version (Linux). Alternatively, log into TMS admin pages and check System > About or Help > About.Affected if The installed version is 15.9 or any version lower than 15.9.
-
Verify the web-based management interface is enabledConfirm the TMS web service is running by accessing https://<tms-host>/tms in a browser or checking that port 443 (or configured HTTPS port) is listening via 'netstat -an | findstr :443' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 443'.Affected if The web interface is accessible and accepts authentication.
-
Confirm TMS administrator accounts existSince this is an authenticated XSS, verify that user accounts with web interface access are configured. Check via TMS admin console under Administration > User Administration, or check local Windows/AD groups authorized for TMS access.Affected if At least one authenticated user account has access to the web management interface.
You are affected if Cisco TelePresence Management Suite is installed with a version of 15.9 or lower and the web-based management interface is accessible with at least one authenticated user.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data fields in the web interface. Apply context-appropriate sanitization (HTML encoding, JavaScript escaping) before rendering user input.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3185 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3185 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data