CVE-2024-20334
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (TMS) could allow a low-privileged, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting malicious data in a specific data field in the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Cisco TelePresence Management Suite web interface where low-privileged users can inject malicious script code through insufficiently validated input fields, potentially executing arbitrary JavaScript in other users' browser sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.13.5, < 15.13.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco TelePresence Management Suite is installedCheck your systems for the presence of Cisco TMS software. Common installation locations on Windows may be under C:\Program Files\Cisco\ or check for the TMS service using 'services.msc' or 'sc query' command.Affected if Cisco TelePresence Management Suite software is found on the system
-
Determine the installed TMS versionAccess the TMS web interface and navigate to Administration > System Settings > TMS Server Information, or check the installed programs list in Windows Control Panel, or run 'tmssetup -version' if available from command line.Affected if The installed version is 15.13.5, 15.13.6, or any version >= 15.13.5 but < 15.13.7
-
Verify the TMS web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the TMS web interface via browser at the configured URL (commonly https://hostname/tms or port 443). Confirm the service is running by checking the TMS service status in Windows Services or via 'net start' command.Affected if The TMS web interface is reachable and accepts authentication
-
Confirm presence of low-privileged user accountsLog into TMS with administrator credentials and review User Administration to list all configured users and their permission levels. Check for non-admin accounts with 'User' or 'Guest' level access.Affected if Low-privileged user accounts (non-administrator) exist in the TMS user database
You are affected if Cisco TelePresence Management Suite is installed with version 15.13.5 through 15.13.6, the web interface is enabled, and low-privileged users have access to input fields that can be exploited for stored XSS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.13.7
Apply Cisco's patch when available; implement proper input validation and output encoding on affected data fields, and restrict TMS administrative access to reduce attack surface until patch is applied.
15.13.7 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of Cisco TelePresence Management Suite (TMS) by checking the About or System Information page in the web-based management interface
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Back up the TMS configuration data according to Cisco backup procedures
- 4. Download the fixed TMS version 15.13.7 or later from the Cisco software downloads page
- 5. Apply the upgrade following Cisco's standard TMS upgrade documentation
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the TMS version in the web-based management interface
- 7. Test that the web-based management interface functions normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20334 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20334 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data