StarosOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2020-3244

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 21.18.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Enhanced Charging Service (ECS) functionality of Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the traffic classification rules on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of user traffic going through an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malformed HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the traffic classification rules and potentially avoid being charged for traffic consumption.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is an input validation vulnerability in the Enhanced Charging Service (ECS) of Cisco ASR 5000 Series routers. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send malformed HTTP requests to bypass traffic classification rules, allowing them to avoid being charged for data consumption. The root cause is insufficient validation of user traffic passing through the device.

MitigationApply the Cisco vendor patch/softwre update for CVE-2020-3244. If unavailable, implement additional monitoring for anomalous HTTP traffic patterns that may indicate exploitation and consider network-level controls to validate traffic classification.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
StarosOperating system
Affected:< 21.18.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Log into the router CLI and run 'show hardware' or 'show version' to confirm this is a Cisco ASR 5000 Series router
    Affected if Device is a Cisco ASR 5000 Series router running Cisco Staros
  2. Check the Cisco Staros version
    Run 'show version' or 'show build' in the router CLI to retrieve the installed Staros version number
    Affected if Installed Staros version is lower than 21.18.0 (for example, 21.17.0, 21.16.0, etc.)
  3. Verify Enhanced Charging Service is enabled
    Run 'show configuration ecs' or 'show ecs status' in the CLI to check if ECS feature is actively configured on the device
    Affected if ECS is enabled and actively processing traffic classification rules
  4. Inspect ECS classification rules for HTTP
    Run 'show ecs policy' or 'show ecs charging-rule' to view the defined traffic classification rules, particularly those handling HTTP traffic
    Affected if There are active HTTP charging/classification rules that could be bypassed
  5. Review traffic logs for malformed HTTP requests
    Check ECS billing or accounting logs using 'show logs billing' or 'show logs charging' for unusual HTTP request patterns that may indicate rule bypass attempts
    Affected if Logs show HTTP traffic that is not being classified or charged as expected based on configured rules

The environment is affected if it is a Cisco ASR 5000 Series router running Cisco Staros version below 21.18.0 with ECS enabled and processing HTTP traffic classification rules.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 21.18.0 or later
Fixed in 21.18.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the Cisco vendor patch/softwre update for CVE-2020-3244. If unavailable, implement additional monitoring for anomalous HTTP traffic patterns that may indicate exploitation and consider network-level controls to validate traffic classification.

Fix this in Staros Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3244 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data