CVE-2020-3283
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL)/Transport Layer Security (TLS) handler of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software when running on the Cisco Firepower 1000 Series platform could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a communication error between internal functions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SSL/TLS message to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a buffer underrun, which leads to a crash. The crash causes the affected device to reload.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer underrun vulnerability in the SSL/TLS handler of Cisco FTD software on Firepower 1000 Series devices allows unauthenticated remote attackers to crash and force a device reload by sending crafted SSL/TLS messages. The flaw stems from a communication error between internal functions during TLS message processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.0.9= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)= 9.12\(2.12\)= 9.13\(0.33\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco device model and software typeLog into the device CLI or check the device inventory. For FTD, run 'show version' or check Firepower Management Center. For ASA, run 'show version' from privileged mode.Affected if The device is a Firepower 1000 Series running FTD, or an ASA 5505/5510/5512X/5515X/5520/5525X/5540.
-
Determine the Firepower Threat Defense versionRun 'show version' on the FTD device or check the Firepower Management Center for the FTD version. Note the full version string including the maintenance release number.Affected if The FTD version is 6.4.0 through 6.4.0.8 (any version >= 6.4.0 but < 6.4.0.9).
-
Determine the ASA firmware versionRun 'show version' on the ASA device. Look for the version string in the format 9.12(x.xx) or 9.13(x.xx).Affected if The ASA firmware version is exactly 9.12(2.12) or 9.13(0.33).
-
Verify SSL/TLS inspection is enabledCheck the FTD or ASA configuration for SSL/TLS inspection policies. On FTD, use 'show running-config | include ssl' or check the inspection policy map. On ASA, run 'show service-policy | include inspection' and verify SSL inspection is active.Affected if SSL/TLS inspection or decryption is configured and active on the device interface exposed to network traffic.
-
Check device accessibility and recent crash logsReview system logs and crashinfo files for recent reloads. Run 'show crashinfo' or check syslog for unexpected reloads. Look for TLS-related error messages preceding any recent device reloads.Affected if The device has experienced unexplained reloads or TLS-related crashes since the affected version was deployed.
A user is affected if their device is a Firepower 1000 Series running FTD version 6.4.0-6.4.0.8, or an ASA model from the list running firmware 9.12(2.12) or 9.13(0.33), with SSL/TLS inspection enabled and the device exposed to untrusted network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.4.0.9
Apply the Cisco FTD software update for CVE-2020-3283 from the Cisco support portal; ensure the Firepower 1000 Series receives the patched version and schedule a maintenance window for the update with post-patch connectivity testing.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3283 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3283 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data