Identity Services EngineApplication · Cisco

CVE-2020-3353

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the syslog processing engine of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a race condition that may occur when syslog messages are processed. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high rate of syslog messages to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the Application Server process to crash, resulting in a DoS condition.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A race condition exists in the syslog processing engine of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE). When an attacker sends a high volume of syslog messages to an affected device, the race condition triggers during message processing, causing the Application Server process to crash and resulting in a denial of service.

MitigationApply the Cisco ISE security patch when available. As an interim measure, consider implementing syslog traffic rate limiting or network segmentation to reduce exposure to unauthenticated syslog traffic.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Identity Services EngineApplication
Affected:= 2.2.0.470= 2.3.0.298= 2.4.0.357

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cisco ISE is installed
    Identify if Cisco Identity Services Engine is deployed in your environment. This is typically an appliance or VM running Cisco ISE software.
    Affected if The system is running Cisco Identity Services Engine software.
  2. Check installed Cisco ISE version
    Use the Cisco ISE admin GUI or CLI command 'show version' to determine the exact version and build number of the installed Cisco ISE software.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.2.0.470, 2.3.0.298, or 2.4.0.357.
  3. Verify syslog receiver is enabled
    In Cisco ISE, navigate to Administration > System > Logging > Logging Categories or use the CLI command 'show logging' to check if syslog message reception is enabled.
    Affected if Syslog logging is enabled and the device is configured to receive syslog messages from network sources.
  4. Check syslog configuration for rate limiting
    Review the syslog configuration in Cisco ISE under Administration > System > Logging > Remote Logging Targets to see if any rate limiting or throttling is configured.
    Affected if No syslog rate limiting is configured and the device accepts syslog traffic from untrusted or unauthenticated sources.

You are affected if you are running Cisco ISE versions 2.2.0.470, 2.3.0.298, or 2.4.0.357 with syslog reception enabled and no rate limiting protection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco ISE security patch when available. As an interim measure, consider implementing syslog traffic rate limiting or network segmentation to reduce exposure to unauthenticated syslog traffic.

Fix this in Identity Services Engine Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3353 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3353 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data