Ios XeOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2020-3407

HIGH · 8.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the RESTCONF and NETCONF-YANG access control list (ACL) function of Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload. The vulnerability is due to incorrect processing of the ACL that is tied to the RESTCONF or NETCONF-YANG feature. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by accessing the device using RESTCONF or NETCONF-YANG. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in the RESTCONF and NETCONF-YANG ACL function of Cisco IOS XE Software allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause device reload by exploiting incorrect processing of the ACL tied to these management interfaces, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationApply the relevant Cisco IOS XE software update or patch. If unavailable, restrict access to RESTCONF and NETCONF-YANG interfaces to trusted management networks and review ACL configurations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ios XeOperating system
Affected:= 15.8\(3\)m3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device OS
    Run 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the device runs Cisco IOS XE software
    Affected if The device is not running Cisco IOS XE, then it is not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Check the IOS XE version
    Run 'show version' and locate the software version number (e.g., 15.8(3)m3)
    Affected if The installed version matches 15.8(3)m3 exactly, the device is in the affected version range
  3. Verify RESTCONF is enabled
    Run 'show ip http server status' or 'show restconf operations' to check if the RESTCONF service is active
    Affected if RESTCONF is enabled and the IOS XE version is 15.8(3)m3, the device is vulnerable
  4. Verify NETCONF-YANG is enabled
    Run 'show netconf-yang status' or 'show netconf-yang sessions' to check if the NETCONF-YANG service is active
    Affected if NETCONF-YANG is enabled and the IOS XE version is 15.8(3)m3, the device is vulnerable
  5. Review ACL applied to management interfaces
    Run 'show ip access-lists' and check the configuration for interface definitions tied to RESTCONF (port 443) and NETCONF-YANG (port 830)
    Affected if An ACL exists on the management interface but is incorrectly processed, combined with enabled RESTCONF/NETCONF-YANG on the affected version, exploitation is possible

A user is affected if the device runs Cisco IOS XE version 15.8(3)m3 and has either RESTCONF or NETCONF-YANG interfaces enabled, regardless of ACL configuration due to the incorrect processing flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant Cisco IOS XE software update or patch. If unavailable, restrict access to RESTCONF and NETCONF-YANG interfaces to trusted management networks and review ACL configurations.

Fix this in Ios Xe Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3407 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3407 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data