CVE-2020-3538
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in a certain REST API endpoint of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a path traversal attack on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient path restriction enforcement. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to overwrite or list arbitrary files on the affected device.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability exists in Cisco DCNM's REST API where insufficient path restriction allows authenticated attackers to use directory traversal sequences (../) in HTTP requests to read or overwrite arbitrary files on the filesystem, potentially leading to full system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.4\(1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco DCNM is installedCheck for Cisco DCNM installation directories (typically /opt/cisco/ or /usr/local/cisco/) or look for the 'dcnm' service running on the system using commands like 'ps aux | grep -i dcnm' or 'systemctl list-units | grep -i dcnm'Affected if Cisco DCNM software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed DCNM versionAccess the DCNM web interface and navigate to the About or Administration section to view the version, or check version files in the installation directory if accessibleAffected if The version is lower than 11.4(1)
-
Verify REST API accessibilityAttempt to access the DCNM REST API endpoint (typically https://<dcnm-host>/rest/ ) using a browser or curl command to confirm the API is enabled and respondingAffected if The REST API is accessible and responds to requests
-
Inspect API access logs for traversal patternsReview DCNM access logs (typically found in /opt/cisco/dcnm/logs/ or similar logging directories) for HTTP requests containing '../' or directory traversal sequences sent to REST API endpointsAffected if Logs contain requests with '../' traversal patterns targeting the REST API
The environment is affected if Cisco Data Center Network Manager is installed with a version lower than 11.4(1) and the REST API is accessible, particularly if logs show directory traversal attempts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.4
Apply the Cisco software updates that address this vulnerability; no workarounds are available.
DCNM version 11.4(1) or later
- 1. Back up the current DCNM configuration and ensure you have a complete system backup before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 2. Download the Cisco DCNM version 11.4(1) or later from the Cisco Software Download center (software.cisco.com).
- 3. Review the DCNM installation and upgrade guide for your specific deployment mode (standalone or cluster).
- 4. Ensure you have appropriate downtime scheduled as the upgrade may require service interruption.
- 5. Follow the documented upgrade procedure: stop DCNM services, run the installer for the new version, verify the upgrade completed successfully.
- 6. After upgrade, verify the DCNM web interface is accessible and confirm the version shows 11.4(1) or later.
- 7. Test that the REST API endpoints are functioning properly after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3538 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3538 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data