CVE-2020-5583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCybozu Garoon 4.0.0 to 5.0.1 allows remote authenticated attackers to bypass access restriction to obtain unauthorized Multi-Report's data via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCybozu Garoon versions 4.0.0 to 5.0.1 contain an access control bypass vulnerability in the Multi-Report module. Authenticated remote attackers can bypass existing access restrictions to view unauthorized data records they should not have permission to access. The exact exploitation method is not specified in the CVE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, <= 5.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cybozu Garoon versionCheck the product version through the Garoon administration interface (System Settings > System Information) or by examining the garoon/version file if accessible on the serverAffected if The installed version is 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 5.0.0, or 5.0.1 (any version from 4.0.0 through 5.0.1 inclusive)
-
Confirm Multi-Report module is in useVerify whether the Multi-Report (多元化レポート) application module is installed and enabled in your Garoon environment through the administration screenAffected if Multi-Report module is installed and active in the affected version range
-
Review access logs for anomaliesExamine Garoon access logs (特别是 MULTI_REPORT モジュール records) for patterns of unauthorized data access from users who should not have permission to view certain recordsAffected if Logs show authenticated users accessing Multi-Report data records outside their normal permissions
You are affected if Cybozu Garoon version 4.0.0 through 5.0.1 is installed AND the Multi-Report module is enabled, as this combination allows authenticated attackers to bypass access controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch by updating Cybozu Garoon to version 5.0.2 or later. This is a direct access control bypass that cannot be meaningfully mitigated through configuration changes.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data