CVE-2020-5657
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in TCP/IP function included in the firmware of MELSEC iQ-R series (RJ71EIP91 EtherNet/IP Network Interface Module First 2 digits of serial number are '02' or before, RJ71PN92 PROFINET IO Controller Module First 2 digits of serial number are '01' or before, RD81DL96 High Speed Data Logger Module First 2 digits of serial number are '08' or before, RD81MES96N MES Interface Module First 2 digits of serial number are '04' or before, and RD81OPC96 OPC UA Server Module First 2 digits of serial number are '04' or before) allows unauthenticated attackers on adjacent network to stop the network functions of the products via a specially crafted packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an Argument Injection vulnerability in the TCP/IP function of multiple MELSEC iQ-R series firmware modules. Attackers on the adjacent network can send specially crafted packets with improperly neutralized argument delimiters to inject commands, allowing unauthenticated attackers to stop the network functions of affected modules.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed MELSEC iQ-R modulesAccess the PLC/controller programming software (such as GX Works3) and review the hardware configuration or module list to identify if any of these modules are present: RJ71EIP91, RJ71PN92, RD81DL96, RD81MES96N, or RD81OPC96Affected if Any of the five listed modules appear in the system configuration
-
Confirm TCP/IP function is enabledUsing the programming software, navigate to the module parameters for the identified MELSEC iQ-R module and check if the TCP/IP network function or Ethernet communication is configured and enabled in the module settingsAffected if TCP/IP or Ethernet communication function is enabled in the module parameters
-
Verify module has an IP address on the networkCheck the module network settings to confirm it has been assigned an IP address and is configured for communication on the industrial networkAffected if The module has an active IP address and is configured for network communication
-
Assess network accessibility from adjacent networkReview network segmentation and firewall rules to determine if the PLC network where the module resides is accessible from adjacent networks (other subnetworks or untrusted network segments)Affected if The module is reachable from adjacent network segments without proper network isolation
If a MELSEC iQ-R module from the affected list (RJ71EIP91, RJ71PN92, RD81DL96, RD81MES96N, or RD81OPC96) is present with TCP/IP enabled and accessible from adjacent networks, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2020-5657.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataCheck the serial number prefix of affected modules (02/01/08/04 depending on model) and apply vendor firmware updates when available. Implement network segmentation to restrict adjacent network access and monitor for attempts to exploit this vulnerability.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5657 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5657 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data