CVE-2020-5860
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP 15.0.0-15.1.0.2, 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.2, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.5.2-11.6.5.1 and BIG-IQ 7.0.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0, and 5.2.0-5.4.0, in a High Availability (HA) network failover in Device Service Cluster (DSC), the failover service does not require a strong form of authentication and HA network failover traffic is not encrypted by Transport Layer Security (TLS).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn F5 BIG-IP and BIG-IQ Device Service Clusters, the HA failover service lacks strong authentication and transmits failover traffic in cleartext without TLS encryption. This allows potential attackers to intercept or manipulate high-availability failover communications between clustered devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2.0, <= 5.4.0>= 6.0.0, <= 6.1.0= 7.0.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0>= 11.5.2, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP or BIG-IQ versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or access the web UI under System > Software > Image List to view the installed versionAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: BIG-IP 11.5.2-11.6.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 15.0.0-15.1.0; or BIG-IQ 5.2.0-5.4.0, 6.0.0-6.1.0, 7.0.0
-
Confirm device is part of a High Availability clusterRun 'tmsh show /cm device-group' or check the web UI under Device Management > Device Groups to list active device groupsAffected if The device belongs to a device group with more than one member, indicating HA clustering is configured
-
Check HA failover communication settingsRun 'tmsh list /cm failover' or view the failover configuration under Device Management > Failover Unicast settings in the web UIAffected if The failover configuration shows no TLS encryption enabled or uses a non-encrypted transport for HA heartbeat traffic
-
Verify failover authentication configurationInspect the HA peer configuration by running 'tmsh show /cm' and check if the failover interface uses certificate-based authenticationAffected if The failover interface is configured without strong certificate authentication between clustered devices
A device is affected if it runs a version within the affected ranges AND is configured as part of an HA cluster with unencrypted failover communication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade BIG-IP to 15.1.0.3+ (or 14.1.2.4+, 13.1.3.3+, 12.1.5.2+, 11.6.5.2+) and BIG-IQ to 7.1.0+ to obtain patched versions with proper authentication and TLS-encrypted HA traffic.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5860 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5860 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data