CVE-2021-23005
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn all 7.x and 6.x versions (fixed in 8.0.0), when using a Quorum device for BIG-IQ high availability (HA) for automatic failover, BIG-IQ does not make use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) with the Corosync protocol. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBIG-IQ HA deployments using Quorum devices rely on the Corosync protocol for cluster communication and automatic failover. The vulnerability exists because BIG-IQ versions 7.x and 6.x do not implement TLS encryption for Corosync traffic, allowing unauthenticated attackers on the network to intercept or manipulate HA cluster communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 8.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IQ versionRun the command to display the BIG-IQ version (e.g., 'show sys version' or check the web UI dashboard for the version number)Affected if The version is 6.0.0 through 7.x (any version >= 6.0.0 and < 8.0.0)
-
Determine if HA clustering is configuredCheck whether BIG-IQ is deployed in a High Availability configuration with multiple devices using quorum - look for HA cluster status or membership in the BIG-IQ web UI under Clustering or examine /config/httpd/conf/httpd.conf for cluster-related modulesAffected if HA clustering with quorum devices is enabled and Corosync is in use for cluster communication
-
Verify Corosync protocol is in use for cluster trafficInspect the cluster configuration files or network traffic on the HA management interface to confirm Corosync is being used for inter-node communication - check if traffic is unencrypted on port 5404/5405 (default Corosync ports)Affected if Corosync traffic is flowing without TLS encryption between cluster nodes
-
Assess network isolation of HA management segmentReview network segmentation and firewall rules to determine whether the HA management network (where Corosync communicates) is isolated from untrusted network segmentsAffected if The HA management network is accessible from untrusted segments, allowing potential man-in-the-middle attackers to reach the Corosync traffic
You are affected if BIG-IQ version is between 6.0.0 and 7.x inclusive AND HA clustering with Corosync is enabled AND the HA management network is not strictly isolated from untrusted segments.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.0.0
Upgrade BIG-IQ to version 8.0.0 or later where TLS encryption for Corosync is enforced; if immediate upgrade is not feasible, strictly isolate the HA management network from untrusted segments to reduce exposure to man-in-the-middle attacks.
8.0.0 or later
- Plan and schedule a maintenance window for the BIG-IQ upgrade
- Backup the current BIG-IQ configuration and verify backup integrity
- Review F5 upgrade documentation for BIG-IQ 8.0.0, including release notes and known issues
- Download BIG-IQ 8.0.0 or later from F5 downloads portal
- Upload the upgrade image to the BIG-IQ device
- Initiate the upgrade process following F5 recommended procedures
- After upgrade completes, verify the system is running version 8.0.0 or later
- Test the High Availability (HA) quorum device functionality to confirm Corosync is now using TLS
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-23005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-23005 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data