Netweaver As Abap Business Server PagesApplication · Sap

CVE-2020-6246

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP Business Server Pages Test Application SBSPEXT_TABLE, versions 700, 701, 702, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP Business Server Pages Test Application SBSPEXT_TABLE fails to properly encode user-controlled inputs, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts via reflected XSS. The vulnerability affects multiple versions (700-754) and requires user interaction (e.g., tricking a user into clicking a crafted link) to exploit.

MitigationApply available SAP security patches for this vulnerability. As a compensating control, disable or restrict access to the SBSPEXT_TABLE test application in production environments, and implement output encoding for any user-supplied data displayed in BSP pages.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Netweaver As Abap Business Server PagesApplication
Affected:= 700= 701= 702= 730= 731= 740= 750= 751= 752= 753= 754

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version
    Query the SAP system for the ABAP kernel version using transaction SM51 or by checking the SAP kernel release information. Alternatively, use the SAP ABAP report SYST-VERSION or check the SAP system landscape information.
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 700, 701, 702, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, or 754
  2. Locate the SBSPEXT_TABLE BSP application
    Search for the BSP application SBSPEXT_TABLE in the SAP system using transaction SE80 or BSP application browser. The application is located in the BSP repository under the namespace related to test/seed applications.
    Affected if The SBSPEXT_TABLE BSP application exists in the system
  3. Verify BSP application is accessible
    Attempt to access the BSP application URL pattern: /sap/bc/bsp/sap/sbspext_table or verify through transaction SICF that the BSP service is active. Check if the test application is exposed via the HTTP handler.
    Affected if The SBSPEXT_TABLE BSP application is active and reachable via HTTP/HTTPS endpoints
  4. Confirm application is in production use
    Review whether the system is a production system and whether test applications like SBSPEXT_TABLE are intended to be disabled in this environment. Check system usage type and security configuration.
    Affected if The system is a production environment where test applications should be restricted but SBSPEXT_TABLE remains accessible

A user is affected if their SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version matches 700, 701, 702, 730, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, or 754 AND the SBSPEXT_TABLE BSP test application is present and accessible in their environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available SAP security patches for this vulnerability. As a compensating control, disable or restrict access to the SBSPEXT_TABLE test application in production environments, and implement output encoding for any user-supplied data displayed in BSP pages.

Fix this in Netweaver As Abap Business Server Pages Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6246 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6246 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data