CVE-2023-29185
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP (Business Server Pages) - versions 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, allows an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user to craft a request with certain parameters in certain circumstances which can consume the server's resources sufficiently to make it unavailable over the network without any user interaction.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP Business Server Pages where an authenticated non-administrative user can craft specially designed requests with specific parameters that excessively consume server resources, rendering the server unavailable over the network without requiring any user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 700= 701= 702= 731= 740= 750= 751= 752= 753= 754= 755= 756CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP is installedCheck the SAP system version by executing transaction SM51 (Server Overview) or checking the kernel version via command 'disp+work -v' or in system profile. Confirm the system is running SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP.Affected if The system is running SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP.
-
Confirm the ABAP version falls within the affected rangeExecute transaction SA01 or check via ABAP system information (System > Status). Identify the SAP_BASIS component version and correlate it with the ABAP release version (e.g., 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756).Affected if The installed ABAP version matches one of the listed versions: 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, or 756.
-
Determine if Business Server Pages (BSP) is enabledExecute transaction SICF (Define Services) and check for BSP-related services under the /sap/bc/bsp path. Alternatively, use transaction BSP_STATUS to list active BSP applications.Affected if BSP is enabled and there are active BSP applications running on the system.
-
Check for authenticated non-administrative users with BSP accessReview user access via transaction SUIM (User Information System) or PFCG (Role Maintenance). Identify users with roles that grant access to BSP applications but without administrative privileges (e.g., not SAP_ALL, not with S_DEVELOP for ABAP admin).Affected if Non-administrative users exist with permissions to access BSP applications.
-
Monitor for anomalous BSP request patternsCheck transaction ST03N (Performance Monitoring) or ST03 (Workload Monitor) for BSP-related requests showing unusually high resource consumption. Review transaction SU01 or logs for repeated BSP request patterns from authenticated users.Affected if BSP requests from authenticated non-admin users are consuming excessive server resources.
You are affected if your SAP NetWeaver AS ABAP version is 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, or 756 AND Business Server Pages are enabled AND non-administrative users can submit requests to BSP applications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant SAP security patch for this vulnerability, implement request rate limiting on affected Business Server Pages, and monitor server resource consumption patterns for anomalous activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-29185 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-29185 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data