CVE-2020-7281
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPrivilege Escalation vulnerability in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to delete files the user would otherwise not have access to via manipulating symbolic links to redirect a McAfee delete action to an unintended file. This is achieved through running a malicious script or program on the target machine.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMcAfee Total Protection prior to version 16.0.R26 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability where local users can manipulate symbolic links to redirect the product's file deletion function to arbitrary files the user normally wouldn't have access to. By running a malicious script or program that creates or manipulates symlinks, an unprivileged local user can cause the McAfee product (running with elevated privileges) to delete files outside the user's normal permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.0.r26CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify McAfee Total Protection is installedCheck for the presence of McAfee Total Protection on the system. On Windows, look for the installation in Program Files or check the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\McAfee\Total Protection. On macOS, check /Library/Application Support/McAfee or use the command: ls /Library/Application\ Support/ | grep -i mcafeeAffected if McAfee Total Protection is not found on the system, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Determine installed version of McAfee Total ProtectionRetrieve the product version. On Windows, check the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\McAfee\Total Protection\Version or right-click the McAfee icon in the system tray and select 'About'. On macOS, run: defaults read /Library/Application\ Support/McAfee/mfeedct.cfg ProductVersion 2>/dev/nullAffected if The installed version is lower than 16.0.R26 (for example, 16.0.R25, 16.0.R24, etc.), indicating the vulnerable version is present.
-
Verify the product's real-time scanning or file deletion component is enabledCheck if McAfee's real-time scanning (On-Access Scanner) is active, as this component handles file operations including deletion. On Windows, check the McAfee service 'McShield' is running: Get-Service -Name McShield. Also verify the product is not in a disabled or quiescent state.Affected if The vulnerable file deletion functionality is active and the product runs with elevated privileges, creating the condition for symlink exploitation.
-
Inspect for suspicious symlink activity or recent unauthorized file deletionsReview system logs for unexpected file deletions, particularly in system directories. Check for newly created symbolic links in user-accessible directories that may target sensitive system files. Run: Get-ChildItem -Path C:\Users\ -Recurse -Filter *.symlink -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue (Windows) or find /Users -type l -ls 2>/dev/null (macOS/Linux)Affected if Symlinks targeting system files exist in user directories or logs show unauthorized deletions, indicating possible exploitation attempts.
A system is affected if McAfee Total Protection version 16.0.R26 or later is NOT installed AND the product's file deletion component is actively running with elevated privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data16.0.r26
Upgrade McAfee Total Protection to version 16.0.R26 or later to patch the vulnerability. As a defense-in-depth measure, limit local user privileges and monitor for suspicious scripts that manipulate symbolic links.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-7281 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-7281 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data