Fusionsphere OpenstackOperating system · Huawei

CVE-2020-9225

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
FusionSphere OpenStack 6.5.1 have an improper permissions management vulnerability. The software does not correctly perform a privilege assignment when an actor attempts to perform an action. Successful exploit could allow certain user to do certain operations beyond its privilege.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

FusionSphere OpenStack 6.5.1 contains an improper permissions management vulnerability where the software fails to correctly enforce privilege assignments, allowing authenticated users to perform operations beyond their authorized privileges. This represents a privilege escalation/authorization bypass issue in the cloud platform's access control mechanism.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch for FusionSphere OpenStack 6.5.1 to correct the privilege assignment logic. Until patched, implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) enforcement and monitor for unauthorized administrative actions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Fusionsphere OpenstackOperating system
Affected:= 6.5.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm FusionSphere OpenStack version
    Query the FusionSphere OpenStack version information through the management console or using the openstack version command. This can typically be found in the system information panel or via 'nova-manage version' or 'keystone --version' depending on the deployment.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.5.1, as this is the only affected version listed.
  2. Review RBAC role assignments
    Use the OpenStack command-line tools (keystone or openstack CLI) to list all user role assignments across projects and domains. Run 'openstack role assignment list --all' or equivalent command in the FusionSphere environment.
    Affected if You find users with role assignments that exceed what they should have, or unauthorized privileged roles (such as admin) assigned to non-administrative users.
  3. Check for unexpected admin access
    Audit the Keystone service for any admin-level operations performed by users who should not have administrative privileges. Review authentication logs or audit trails for privilege escalation events.
    Affected if You discover authenticated users performing administrative operations beyond their authorized privileges.
  4. Inspect Keystone policy configuration
    Review the Keystone policy.json file or RBAC policy configuration used by FusionSphere OpenStack to verify how privilege assignments are enforced.
    Affected if The policy configuration allows authenticated users to bypass privilege boundaries or incorrectly assigns elevated roles.

You are affected if your FusionSphere OpenStack installation is version 6.5.1 and you find evidence of users performing operations beyond their assigned privilege levels, indicating the authorization bypass is present.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch for FusionSphere OpenStack 6.5.1 to correct the privilege assignment logic. Until patched, implement strict role-based access control (RBAC) enforcement and monitor for unauthorized administrative actions.

Fix this in Fusionsphere Openstack Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
42.0 hours of engineering $7,360
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9225 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9225 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data