CVE-2020-9672
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe ColdFusion 2016 update 15 and earlier versions, and ColdFusion 2018 update 9 and earlier versions have a dll search-order hijacking vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to privilege escalation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdobe ColdFusion 2016 (update 15 and earlier) and ColdFusion 2018 (update 9 and earlier) contain a DLL search-order hijacking vulnerability. This occurs when the application loads DLLs from insecure paths, allowing an attacker to place a malicious DLL in a location where it will be loaded before the legitimate DLL. Successful exploitation enables privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2016= 2018CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed ColdFusion version and update levelAccess the ColdFusion Administrator console (usually at /cfide/administrator/ or /cfadmin/) and view the version information, or check the version.txt file in the ColdFusion installation directory. For Windows, you can also check the registry key: HKLM\SOFTWARE\Adobe\ColdFusion\CurrentVersionAffected if The version is ColdFusion 2016 with update 15 or earlier, OR ColdFusion 2018 with update 9 or earlier
-
Verify ColdFusion installation directory permissionsOn the server where ColdFusion is installed, check the file system permissions on the main ColdFusion installation folder (typically C:\ColdFusion2016 or C:\ColdFusion2018 on Windows). Use file explorer properties or the icacls command to list permissions.Affected if The ColdFusion installation directory or its subdirectories are writable by users other than Administrators or the service account running ColdFusion
-
Check for writable temp or executable directoriesInspect directories where ColdFusion may load or execute DLLs from, including the ColdFusion temp directory, bin folder, and any directories in the system PATH that are writable by low-privileged users. Use icacls or file explorer to enumerate permissions.Affected if Any directory in the DLL search path (ColdFusion bin, temp, or system PATH) is writable by non-privileged users, allowing DLL planting
-
Review ColdFusion service account privilegesOpen Services (services.msc), find the ColdFusion service, right-click and select Properties, then check the 'Log on as' account. This account should have minimal privileges and should not have write access to application directories.Affected if The ColdFusion service runs under an account with excessive privileges or the same account used by regular users, enabling DLL planting attacks
-
Check for suspicious DLLs in ColdFusion directoriesInspect the ColdFusion installation directory (especially bin and lib folders) for any DLL files that were not part of a recent update or installation. Compare file dates and verify against official Adobe DLL lists if available.Affected if Unexpected or recently added DLL files exist in the ColdFusion installation directory that could indicate attempted exploitation
You are affected if ColdFusion 2016 is at update 15 or earlier, or ColdFusion 2018 is at update 9 or earlier, AND the installation directory or any directory in the DLL search path is writable by non-privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied patches for ColdFusion 2016 and 2018 to the respective update versions that address this vulnerability. Additionally, ensure ColdFusion runs with minimal privileges and that the application directory is not writable by low-privileged users to prevent DLL planting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-9672 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-9672 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data