CVE-2021-0276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Juniper Networks SBR Carrier with EAP (Extensible Authentication Protocol) authentication configured, allows an attacker sending specific packets causing the radius daemon to crash resulting with a Denial of Service (DoS) or leading to remote code execution (RCE). By continuously sending this specific packets, an attacker can repeatedly crash the radius daemon, causing a sustained Denial of Service (DoS). This issue affects Juniper Networks SBR Carrier: 8.4.1 versions prior to 8.4.1R19; 8.5.0 versions prior to 8.5.0R10; 8.6.0 versions prior to 8.6.0R4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Juniper SBR Carrier's radius daemon exists when EAP (Extensible Authentication Protocol) is configured. An unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted packets to trigger the overflow, causing denial of service or potentially achieving remote code execution. The vulnerability allows sustained DoS via repeated crashes of the radius daemon.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.4.1= 8.5.0= 8.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Juniper SBR Carrier installationLocate the Steel Belted Radius Carrier installation directory or check installed software packages on the systemAffected if Juniper Steel Belted Radius Carrier is not present on the system
-
Verify the SBR Carrier versionCheck the installed version of Steel Belted Radius Carrier against the affected versions: 8.4.1, 8.5.0, or 8.6.0Affected if The installed version matches exactly 8.4.1, 8.5.0, or 8.6.0
-
Confirm EAP authentication is enabledInspect the RADIUS server configuration to determine whether Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) is configured as an authentication methodAffected if EAP authentication is enabled in the RADIUS configuration
-
Assess network exposure of RADIUS serviceVerify whether the RADIUS daemon port (typically UDP 1812) is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The RADIUS service is exposed to untrusted or public networks
A user is affected if they have Steel Belted Radius Carrier version 8.4.1, 8.5.0, or 8.6.0 with EAP authentication enabled and the RADIUS service is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches: upgrade to 8.4.1R19, 8.5.0R10, or 8.6.0R4 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling EAP authentication or restricting network access to the RADIUS service.
Upgrade to 8.4.1R19 (if on 8.4.1), 8.5.0R10 (if on 8.5.0), or 8.6.0R4 (if on 8.6.0) - choose the next sequential release for your current branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed SBR Carrier version by checking the system or running: 'sbrc -version' or reviewing system documentation
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on current version (8.4.1 -> 8.4.1R19, 8.5.0 -> 8.5.0R10, or 8.6.0 -> 8.6.0R4)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed release from the Juniper Networks download portal or contact Juniper support
- 4. Review the release notes for the target version (8.4.1R19, 8.5.0R10, or 8.6.0R4) for any specific upgrade prerequisites or注意事项
- 5. Back up the current SBR Carrier configuration before proceeding with the upgrade
- 6. Install the upgrade following Juniper's standard upgrade procedure for SBR Carrier
- 7. After upgrade, verify the radius daemon is running: 'radcheck' or similar status command
- 8. Confirm the fixed version is installed: 'sbrc -version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-0276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-0276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data