Rv110w FirmwareOperating system · Cisco
CVE-2021-1196
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W Routers could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause an affected device to restart unexpectedly. The vulnerabilities are due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by sending crafted HTTP requests to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user on the underlying operating system or cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. To exploit these vulnerabilities, an attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials on the affected device. Cisco has not released software updates that address these vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple input validation vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Small Business RV110W, RV130, RV130W, and RV215W routers allow authenticated attackers with admin credentials to execute arbitrary code as root user or cause device reload (DoS). The flaws stem from improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests to the management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Rv110w FirmwareOperating system
= 1.2.2.8= 1.3.1.7
Rv130 Vpn Router FirmwareOperating system
= 1.2.2.8= 1.3.1.7
Rv130w FirmwareOperating system
= 1.2.2.8= 1.3.1.7
Rv215w Wireless N Vpn Router FirmwareOperating system
= 1.2.2.8= 1.3.1.7
Application Extension PlatformPlugin / extension
= 1.0.3.55CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router web interface or check the device label to confirm the model is RV110W, RV130, RV130W, or RV215W.Affected if Device model matches one of these four models.
-
Check firmware versionLog into the web-based management interface and navigate to Administration > Firmware Upgrade or Status page to view the current firmware version. Alternatively, check via CLI if accessible.Affected if Firmware version is exactly 1.2.2.8 or 1.3.1.7.
-
Check for Cisco Application Extension PlatformIf this optional software platform is installed on the router, verify its version through the management interface or associated application documentation.Affected if Cisco Application Extension Platform version is 1.0.3.55.
-
Verify web-based management interface is enabledCheck router configuration under Administration > Management or similar section to confirm the web-based management interface is enabled, particularly if accessible from WAN/remote networks.Affected if Web-based management interface is enabled and accessible.
-
Confirm admin accounts existCheck user accounts configuration in the router interface to verify that administrator accounts are configured, as exploitation requires valid admin credentials.Affected if At least one admin-level user account is configured on the device.
The device is affected if it is an RV110W, RV130, RV130W, or RV215W router running firmware version 1.2.2.8 or 1.3.1.7 (or Cisco Application Extension Platform 1.0.3.55) with the web-based management interface enabled and admin credentials configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince Cisco has not released patches, implement compensating controls: isolate affected routers in restricted network segments, disable remote management access from untrusted networks, enforce strong admin credentials, and plan for hardware replacement as the ultimate remediation.
Fix this in Rv110w Firmware
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1196 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data