CVE-2021-1441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the hardware initialization routines of Cisco IOS XE Software for Cisco 1100 Series Industrial Integrated Services Routers and Cisco ESR6300 Embedded Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute unsigned code at system boot time. This vulnerability is due to incorrect validations of parameters passed to a diagnostic script that is executed when the device boots up. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by tampering with an executable file stored on a device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute unsigned code at boot time and bypass the software image verification check part of the secure boot process of an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need administrative level credentials (level 15) on the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE Software allows an authenticated attacker with administrative (level 15) credentials to execute unsigned code during system boot by tampering with an executable file stored on the device. The root cause is insufficient validation of parameters passed to a diagnostic script that runs during boot, which enables bypass of the secure boot image verification process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.15.1xbs= 3.15.2xbs= 16.9.1= 16.9.1c= 16.10.1= 16.10.1e= 16.11.1= 16.11.1c= 16.11.1s= 16.12.1= 16.12.1c= 16.12.1sCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device is running Cisco IOS XERun 'show version' and look for 'IOS XE' in the output, or check the boot prompt for 'IOS-XE'Affected if The device is not running Cisco IOS XE Software, then this CVE does not apply
-
Determine the installed IOS XE versionRun 'show version' and locate the version string (e.g., 'Version 16.9.1') in the outputAffected if The installed version matches one of these: 3.15.1xbs, 3.15.2xbs, 16.9.1, 16.9.1c, 16.10.1, 16.10.1e, 16.11.1, 16.11.1c, 16.11.1s, 16.12.1, 16.12.1c, 16.12.1s
-
Check if administrative (level 15) access is configuredRun 'show running-config | include username' or 'show privilege' to see privilege level settings; verify whether level 15 accounts existAffected if Unrestricted administrative accounts exist on the device, the exploitation path is available
-
Verify the integrity of boot-related executable filesRun 'show file verify' or 'dir flash:' to list files; compare file hashes against known-good values if availableAffected if Any diagnostic or boot script files have been modified or tampered with on the device
-
Check secure boot status if availableRun 'show secure-boot' or look for secure boot configuration in 'show version' outputAffected if Secure boot is disabled or not properly enforced on the device
A device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS XE versions 3.15.1xbs, 3.15.2xbs, 16.9.1, 16.9.1c, 16.10.1, 16.10.1e, 16.11.1, 16.11.1c, 16.11.1s, 16.12.1, 16.12.1c, or 16.12.1s and allows authenticated administrative access with potential for tamperable boot files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch/更新 for this vulnerability to the affected IOS XE software versions on the Cisco 1100 Series ISR and ESR6300 routers. Restrict administrative access and monitor for unauthorized physical access to prevent tampering of stored executable files.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data