CVE-2021-1450
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the interprocess communication (IPC) channel of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending one or more crafted IPC messages to the AnyConnect process on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to stop the AnyConnect process, causing a DoS condition on the device. Note: The process under attack will automatically restart so no action is needed by the user or admin.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the interprocess communication (IPC) channel of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client. An authenticated local attacker with valid credentials can send crafted IPC messages containing insufficiently validated user-supplied input to the AnyConnect process, causing it to crash and result in a denial of service condition. While the process automatically restarts, the DoS interruption still occurs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.9\(5086\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AnyConnect installation and versionLocate the Cisco AnyConnect client on the system and determine its exact version number. On Windows, this is typically found in Add/Remove Programs, or by checking the program's properties. On macOS, check /Applications for Cisco AnyConnect. The specific vulnerable version is 4.9 build 5086.Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.9 (5086)
-
Confirm the vulnerable version matchesVerify that the build number matches 5086 specifically. Compare your installed AnyConnect version string against '4.9(5086)' as shown in the affected products list.Affected if The version string equals 4.9(5086)
-
Assess local authentication exposureDetermine if the system permits local user accounts or has users with valid credentials who can log in locally. Since this vulnerability requires an authenticated local attacker, check for local user accounts, shared credentials, or systems where multiple users have login access.Affected if Local authenticated users or shared credential accounts exist on the system
-
Check for AnyConnect process crash indicatorsReview system logs, application event logs (Windows Event Viewer), or AnyConnect-specific logs for evidence of the vpnui.exe or acvpui.exe processes crashing unexpectedly. Look for sudden process termination events occurring with the AnyConnect client.Affected if AnyConnect process crash events are logged or the client becomes intermittently unavailable
You are affected if Cisco AnyConnect version 4.9 build 5086 is installed and the system allows local authenticated access, which would enable an attacker to send malicious IPC messages causing denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch from Cisco when available; until then, limit system access to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for suspicious IPC message activity targeting the AnyConnect process.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1450 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1450 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data