CVE-2021-1453
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the software image verification functionality of Cisco IOS XE Software for the Cisco Catalyst 9000 Family of switches could allow an unauthenticated, physical attacker to execute unsigned code at system boot time. The vulnerability is due to an improper check in the code function that manages the verification of the digital signatures of system image files during the initial boot process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by loading unsigned software on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned code and bypass the image verification check part of the secure boot process of an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have unauthenticated physical access to the device or obtain privileged access to the root shell on the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE for Catalyst 9000 switches allows an attacker to bypass the image verification check during the boot process by exploiting an improper check in the digital signature verification function. Successful exploitation enables booting unsigned software or executing arbitrary unsigned code at system startup, effectively bypassing secure boot protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.15.1xbs= 3.15.2xbs= 16.6.1= 16.6.2= 16.6.3= 16.6.4= 16.6.4a= 16.6.4s= 16.6.5= 16.6.6= 16.6.7= 16.6.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device model and software platformRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the device is a Cisco Catalyst 9000 series switch running Cisco IOS XE software.Affected if The device is a Catalyst 9000 series switch running IOS XE.
-
Determine the IOS XE versionRun 'show version' and locate the 'IOS XE' or 'Software' version line. Compare this version number exactly against the affected versions: 3.15.1xbs, 3.15.2xbs, 16.6.1, 16.6.2, 16.6.3, 16.6.4, 16.6.4a, 16.6.4s, 16.6.5, 16.6.6, 16.6.7, 16.6.8.Affected if The installed IOS XE version matches one of the listed affected versions.
-
Check if secure boot is configuredRun 'show secure-boot' to display the secure boot status. Also run 'show platform' or consult the boot configuration to verify whether secure boot is enabled on the system.Affected if Secure boot is enabled (the vulnerability allows bypassing it, so if secure boot is active, the device is a target for exploitation).
-
Inspect boot logs and system startup messagesDuring or after boot, examine console output or run 'show logging' to look for any anomalies in the boot process, such as signature verification failures, unexpected boot prompts, or indications that unsigned code was loaded.Affected if There are irregularities in boot process logs or evidence that unsigned software was loaded.
If the device is a Catalyst 9000 switch running IOS XE version 16.6.x or 3.15.xbs matching the affected list and secure boot is enabled, the environment is potentially affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch/firmware update for CVE-2021-1453 to all affected Catalyst 9000 series switches. Since exploitation requires physical access or root shell privileges, ensure physical security controls and restrict root access as compensating measures until patching is complete.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1453 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1453 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data