Secure Firewall Threat DefenseApplication · Cisco

CVE-2021-1495

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-04-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.9.17.1 / 6.4.0.12 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of specific HTTP header parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP packets and deliver a malicious payload.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This vulnerability in Cisco's Snort detection engine allows remote attackers to bypass configured HTTP file policies by sending crafted HTTP packets with specific malformed header parameters. The Snort engine incorrectly processes these headers, permitting malicious payloads to pass through without being blocked by the file inspection policy.

MitigationApply Cisco-provided patches and updates for affected products. Ensure HTTP file policies are reviewed and consider additional inspection layers until patches are deployed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure Firewall Threat DefenseApplication
Affected:< 6.4.0.12>= 6.5.0, < 6.6.4>= 6.7.0, < 6.7.0.2
Ios XeApplication
Affected:>= 16.12, < 16.12.5>= 17.1, < 17.3.3>= 17.4, < 17.4.1
SnortApplication
Affected:< 2.9.17.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product and version
    Run 'show version' on the Cisco device or check the Snort version via 'snort --version'
    Affected if The version falls within: FTD < 6.4.0.12, FTD 6.5.0-6.6.3, FTD 6.7.0-6.7.0.1; IOS Xe 16.12.x before 16.12.5, 17.1.x-17.3.2, 17.4.x before 17.4.1; or Snort versions before 2.9.17.1
  2. Confirm Snort is actively inspecting HTTP traffic
    Check the device configuration for enabled Snort inspection on HTTP ports, typically via 'show service-policy' or examining the inspection policy map
    Affected if Snort inspection is enabled for HTTP traffic (ports 80, 8080, etc.)
  3. Verify HTTP file policy is configured
    Examine the HTTP file inspection policy via 'show policy-map' or the device management interface to see if file policies are defined
    Affected if An HTTP file policy exists and is applied to traffic inspection - the bypass only matters when file policies are in use
  4. Check for recent Snort HTTP inspection events
    Review Snort alerts and logs for HTTP traffic, particularly files being transferred - look for any unexpected allow actions on suspicious files
    Affected if HTTP file transfers are being processed but not blocked despite potentially malicious file types being detected

A defender is affected if they run any of the listed product versions AND have HTTP file policies enabled with Snort inspection active, allowing crafted HTTP header packets to bypass file type restrictions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.9.17.1 / 6.4.0.12 / 6.6.4 or later
Fixed in 2.9.17.16.4.0.126.6.4
Interim mitigation

Apply Cisco-provided patches and updates for affected products. Ensure HTTP file policies are reviewed and consider additional inspection layers until patches are deployed.

Fix this in Secure Firewall Threat Defense Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1495 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1495 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data